

Compare distributors and commercial agents under Turkish law. Learn the differences in ownership, pricing, commissions, authority, competition rules, termination, goodwill indemnity, liability, and dispute resolution in Turkey.
Foreign companies entering the Turkish market frequently choose between appointing a local distributor and engaging a commercial agent. Although both structures may help a foreign business develop customers and increase sales in Turkey, their legal and commercial consequences are fundamentally different.
A distributor usually buys products from the foreign supplier and resells them in its own name and for its own account. A commercial agent, by contrast, generally acts as an independent intermediary that promotes or negotiates transactions on behalf of the foreign principal. Depending on the authority granted, the agent may also conclude contracts in the principal’s name.
This distinction affects almost every important aspect of the relationship, including:
The title of the agreement is not decisive. Turkish courts and authorities may examine how the relationship actually operates. Calling a contract a “distribution agreement” will not necessarily prevent it from being treated as an agency relationship if the Turkish intermediary acts in the name and on behalf of the foreign company.
Foreign companies should therefore select and document the structure carefully before transferring products, customer relationships, marketing rights, technical information, or territorial exclusivity.
Commercial agency is expressly regulated by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, particularly Articles 102 to 123.
A commercial agent is generally an independent person who continuously carries out activities aimed at negotiating contracts relating to a commercial enterprise or concluding such contracts in the name of that enterprise within a particular place or territory.
The essential characteristics usually include:
The agent is not ordinarily an employee, branch, or internal sales representative. It conducts its own independent business while representing the commercial interests of the principal.
The Turkish Commercial Code treats commercial agency as a specifically regulated commercial relationship and provides rules on authority, duties, commission, termination, post-contract restrictions, and goodwill indemnity.
Unlike commercial agency, distributorship is not comprehensively regulated as a separately defined nominate contract in the Turkish Commercial Code.
A distributorship agreement is generally considered a continuing commercial contract under which the distributor:
The legal framework may arise from:
Because there is no single statutory chapter governing all distribution relationships, contractual drafting is particularly important.
The most important distinction is whether the Turkish intermediary conducts its own resale business or acts as an intermediary for the foreign company’s business.
A distributor ordinarily conducts its own business. It buys and resells products and earns a resale margin.
A commercial agent ordinarily develops or concludes transactions for the principal. The principal generally remains the seller or service provider in the customer relationship, and the agent earns commission.
This difference influences taxation, customer contracts, product claims, pricing, collection, regulatory responsibilities, and termination consequences.
| Issue | Distributor | Commercial Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases goods | Usually yes | Usually no |
| Resells in own name | Yes | Generally no |
| Acts for supplier | Not ordinarily | Yes |
| Customer contract | Distributor–customer | Principal–customer |
| Income | Resale margin | Commission |
| Inventory risk | Usually distributor | Usually principal |
| Customer non-payment risk | Usually distributor | Usually principal |
| Pricing | Distributor normally sets resale price | Principal generally sets contractual price |
| Authority to bind foreign company | Usually no | Possible if authorised |
| Statutory regulation | Mainly contractual/general law | Expressly regulated by TCC |
| Goodwill indemnity risk | Possible by analogy in suitable cases | Expressly regulated |
| Registration of authority | Usually unnecessary | May be necessary depending on authority |
| Competition-law exposure | Significant | Depends on genuine agency status |
| Product ownership | Usually passes to distributor | Usually remains with principal until customer sale |
| Customer ownership | Distributor generally controls its customer contracts | Customer relationships generally belong commercially to principal |
No.
Turkish legal analysis generally considers the actual rights, obligations, risks, and business practices of the parties.
A relationship called an “agency agreement” may function as a distributorship where the intermediary:
Similarly, a contract labelled “distribution agreement” may display agency characteristics where the intermediary:
Foreign companies should ensure that the contract language, invoicing model, customer documentation, logistics structure, and actual conduct remain consistent.
In a genuine distribution model, the distributor normally enters into the customer contract in its own name.
The legal chain often consists of two separate sales:
The foreign supplier is not automatically a party to the distributor’s customer contracts.
However, direct warranties, product guarantees, marketing statements, regulatory commitments, or direct communications may still create legal exposure for the foreign supplier.
In an agency model, the contract is generally concluded between the foreign principal and the Turkish customer.
The agent may:
The principal is generally responsible for performing the customer contract.
Potentially, yes.
The scope of the agent’s authority should be expressly defined. An agent may be authorised only to negotiate contracts or may be given authority to conclude contracts in the principal’s name.
The agreement should clarify whether the agent can:
If authority is unclear, apparent-authority and third-party reliance disputes may arise.
A foreign company should also review whether a power of attorney, notarisation, apostille, translation, commercial-register filing, or another formality is needed for particular acts.
A distributor usually purchases and owns the inventory after title transfers under the supply agreement.
It commonly bears:
The contract should specify when title and risk transfer, preferably by coordinating the sales terms with the selected Incoterms® 2020 rule.
A commercial agent normally does not purchase the products for resale. Depending on the business model, products may be shipped directly by the principal to the customer.
Where demonstration goods, samples, spare parts, or consignment inventory are held by the agent, ownership and responsibility should be separately regulated.
A distributor earns the difference between:
Its profitability depends on freight, customs duties, taxes, storage, marketing, credit losses, rebates, service expenses, and other operating costs.
A commercial agent generally receives commission calculated according to:
The commission clause should address:
Turkish statutory agency provisions may apply where the contract is silent or where mandatory protections cannot be waived.
A distributor usually bears the risk that its Turkish customer will fail to pay, because the distributor is the seller in the downstream transaction.
The distributor must generally pay the foreign supplier according to the supply agreement even if it cannot collect from its own customer, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.
A commercial agent generally does not bear customer credit risk merely because it introduced or negotiated the transaction. The principal contracts with the customer and usually bears the non-payment risk.
However, the agent may assume additional responsibility under a specifically drafted guarantee, del credere, collection, or indemnity arrangement. Such provisions require careful review because they may significantly change the economic nature of the relationship.
A distributor normally determines its own resale prices because it operates as an independent reseller.
A supplier may, depending on the circumstances:
However, imposing fixed or minimum resale prices may create serious Turkish competition-law risk.
The Turkish Competition Authority’s guidance indicates that resellers should generally remain free to determine their own resale prices. Recommended or maximum prices may be permissible only where they do not operate in practice as fixed or minimum prices.
Indirect resale price maintenance may also arise through:
Foreign suppliers should therefore avoid treating independent distributors as internal sales departments.
In a genuine agency relationship, the principal ordinarily determines the commercial terms offered to customers because the resulting customer contract is the principal’s own contract.
Nevertheless, whether an arrangement qualifies as genuine agency for competition-law purposes depends not only on its label but also on whether the agent bears significant commercial or financial risks.
Distribution agreements are usually vertical agreements between businesses operating at different levels of the supply chain.
They may be assessed under:
The vertical block-exemption framework was amended in 2021, including changes concerning the applicable market-share threshold. Foreign businesses should not assume that an older EU-style or global distribution template automatically complies with current Turkish competition rules.
Competition-sensitive provisions include:
Vertical arrangements that do not qualify for block exemption may still require individual assessment under the conditions of Law No. 4054.
Both distributors and agents may be appointed for an exclusive territory, customer category, or product range.
A foreign company may grant exclusivity for:
The agreement should clarify whether exclusivity prevents the foreign company from:
Territorial restrictions must also be reviewed under Turkish competition law. Certain active-sales restrictions may be treated differently from restrictions on passive customer requests. Absolute market partitioning is particularly risky.
Foreign principals commonly wish to retain the right to sell directly to major Turkish customers while appointing an agent or distributor for the rest of the market.
In an agency relationship, the agent may claim commission on transactions concluded within its exclusive territory or customer group even where the principal completed the sale directly, depending on the contract and applicable statutory rules.
The agreement should identify:
Without a clear carve-out, direct sales can become a major source of commission disputes.
A commercial agent is generally expected to protect the principal’s interests and act loyally and diligently.
Typical obligations include:
The principal also owes duties, including providing information, documents, products, pricing, and reasonable operational support necessary for the agency.
A distributor’s duties arise primarily from the contract.
They commonly include:
Targets should be objective and measurable. The agreement should specify whether failure to meet targets results in:
Agents and distributors often receive a limited right to use the foreign company’s trademarks, logos, trade names, product images, and marketing materials.
The licence should state:
Foreign companies should register important trademarks in Turkey before or at the beginning of market entry. Allowing a local intermediary to register the brand, domain name, or social-media account in its own name may create serious exit problems.
The allocation of regulatory responsibility differs significantly between the two models.
A Turkish distributor that imports products may assume obligations concerning:
However, the foreign manufacturer may still face liability under applicable product-safety, consumer, contractual, or tort rules.
In an agency model, the foreign principal may remain the direct seller. The parties must determine who will act as importer, customs declarant, authorised representative, registration holder, or responsible economic operator.
A distributor is generally directly liable to its customer under the downstream sales contract.
Claims may involve:
The distributor may then seek recourse from the foreign supplier under their supply agreement.
In an agency structure, the customer may bring the contractual claim directly against the foreign principal because the agent typically acted on the principal’s behalf.
The agreement should include clear rules on:
A commercial agent should not automatically be assumed to have authority to collect customer payments.
The contract should state whether the agent can:
Where payment collection is permitted, controls should address segregation of funds, reporting, payment deadlines, audit rights, and liability for loss or misuse.
A distributor ordinarily collects its own receivables because it contracts with customers in its own name.
The choice between agency and distribution may affect Turkish tax exposure.
An independent distributor normally conducts its own business and does not automatically constitute a Turkish permanent establishment of the foreign supplier.
An agent may create greater tax risk where it:
The outcome depends on Turkish tax law, the relevant double-tax treaty, and the factual operation of the relationship.
A statement that the agent is “independent” is not sufficient if the actual relationship indicates dependence or extensive authority.
Commercial agents should operate as independent businesses. However, a nominal agency relationship may be alleged to constitute employment if the individual agent:
Reclassification may result in claims involving employment rights, social-security contributions, severance, notice pay, overtime, and annual leave.
This risk is generally lower where the intermediary is a properly organised independent Turkish company, but corporate form alone is not conclusive.
Distribution agreements may be concluded for a fixed or indefinite term.
Termination rights should address:
A termination clause does not always eliminate good-faith, abuse-of-rights, damages, or compensation arguments. The parties’ investments, duration of the relationship, dependency, notice period, and termination conduct may be relevant.
The Turkish Commercial Code contains specific rules governing termination of agency relationships.
A fixed-term agreement normally ends upon expiry unless it is continued in circumstances that convert it into an indefinite relationship.
An indefinite agency agreement may generally be terminated by notice, subject to applicable statutory requirements. Immediate termination may also be possible for just cause.
Wrongful or premature termination may lead to:
One of the most important risks for foreign principals is the agent’s potential claim for goodwill indemnity, also known as portfolio compensation or equalisation indemnity.
Under the Turkish Commercial Code, an agent may claim indemnity after termination where statutory conditions are satisfied, particularly where:
The amount is subject to a statutory ceiling linked generally to the agent’s average annual remuneration calculated over the relevant preceding period.
The claim is not intended simply to compensate every termination. Its purpose is to address the continuing customer value transferred to the principal.
The right is also subject to statutory conditions and time limits. Foreign principals should not assume that a pre-termination waiver will always be enforceable.
Potentially.
Although the Turkish Commercial Code directly regulates goodwill indemnity for commercial agents, its agency provisions also contemplate possible application to certain other continuing commercial relationships, including exclusive distributorships, where equitable considerations and the nature of the relationship justify it.
An exclusive distributor may attempt to claim portfolio compensation where it:
Whether the claim succeeds depends on the contractual and factual circumstances.
Foreign suppliers should therefore not assume that selecting a distributorship automatically eliminates all goodwill-indemnity risk.
These are different concepts.
A notice period gives the intermediary time to prepare for the end of the relationship.
Goodwill indemnity may compensate for lasting customer benefits retained by the principal after termination.
Providing contractual notice does not necessarily eliminate a goodwill-indemnity claim. Similarly, a goodwill payment does not automatically cure an unlawful or contractually defective termination.
A commercial agent may have rights concerning transactions concluded after termination where the business is primarily attributable to the agent’s efforts and was concluded within a reasonable period, or where the relevant customer order was received before termination.
The contract should regulate:
A distributor or agent may be restricted from representing competing products during the contract.
The clause should define:
Overly broad restrictions may create competition-law or enforceability issues.
Post-contractual non-compete obligations are subject to stricter limitations.
For commercial agents, Turkish law imposes particular formal and substantive requirements on post-termination restrictions, including limits relating to territory, customer group, product scope, and duration.
Distribution non-compete clauses must also be reviewed under Turkish competition law and general contract principles. A broad restriction preventing the distributor from operating in an entire sector for an excessive period may be unenforceable or legally risky.
Both structures require strong confidentiality protection.
Protected information may include:
The agreement should address:
A distributor commonly controls its own customer data, while a commercial agent may process customer data on behalf of or jointly with the principal.
Foreign companies must assess their obligations under Turkish personal-data legislation, particularly concerning:
A contractual statement that all customer data belongs to the foreign company does not by itself resolve Turkish data-protection obligations.
Foreign companies may be exposed to legal and reputational harm caused by a Turkish agent or distributor.
The agreement should prohibit:
Recommended protections include:
Commercial agents may create higher corruption risk where they interact with public officials, tender authorities, hospitals, customs personnel, state-owned enterprises, or licensing bodies.
Foreign companies may choose foreign law for an agreement involving a Turkish agent or distributor, subject to Turkish conflict-of-law principles and mandatory rules.
Under Turkey’s private international law framework, parties to an international contractual relationship may generally select the governing law. Where there is no valid choice, the applicable law is determined through statutory connecting factors. Turkish overriding mandatory provisions and public-policy considerations may still apply where relevant.
A foreign-law clause may not automatically prevent the application of Turkish rules relating to:
The governing-law clause should be coordinated with the chosen dispute-resolution forum.
The parties may select:
A dispute-resolution clause should specify:
International arbitration may offer neutrality and enforceability advantages, while Turkish court proceedings may be more practical for urgent relief, local evidence, receivables, trademark misuse, or assets located in Turkey.
Certain monetary commercial claims brought before Turkish courts may also be subject to mandatory pre-litigation mediation.
Not automatically.
A commercial agent is intended to be legally independent. However, the agent’s authority, activities, premises, branding, and degree of control may generate issues concerning:
Foreign companies should avoid language suggesting that the agent is a branch, subsidiary, employee, partner, or unrestricted legal representative unless that status is intended.
Not necessarily.
A distributor generally owns its downstream customer relationships because it contracts and trades in its own name.
A foreign supplier seeking long-term market visibility should negotiate rights concerning:
Such rights should be proportionate and competition-law compliant.
Commercial agency generally gives the foreign principal more control over:
However, it may also expose the principal to:
Distribution gives the foreign supplier more commercial separation but usually less control over:
A genuine distributorship generally transfers more commercial risk to the Turkish intermediary.
The distributor often bears:
In a genuine agency relationship, the principal usually bears more of these risks, while the agent earns commission for developing or concluding transactions.
The greater risk borne by the intermediary, the more likely the relationship resembles distribution rather than genuine agency.
A distributorship may be suitable where the foreign company wants:
It is often preferred for consumer goods, industrial components, machinery, electronics, medical products, food, chemicals, and other products requiring local sales infrastructure.
A commercial agency may be suitable where the foreign company wants:
Agency is common in project sales, specialised machinery, defence-related sectors, shipping, industrial equipment, consultancy-linked sales, and high-value business-to-business transactions.
A well-drafted agreement should address:
A commercial agency agreement should address:
Foreign businesses frequently:
As of 2026, the principal Turkish statutory framework for commercial agency remains the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102. Distribution agreements continue to be governed primarily by their contractual terms together with general commercial, obligations, competition, intellectual property, tax, customs, and regulatory rules.
The vertical-agreements regime under Communiqué No. 2002/2, as amended, remains highly important for distribution systems. Businesses should review market-share conditions and hard-core restrictions rather than relying on older templates or assumptions based solely on another jurisdiction’s competition rules.
The most important 2026 compliance priorities include:
No foreign company should appoint a Turkish agent or distributor solely through a short appointment letter without reviewing these issues.
A distributor buys and resells products in its own name and for its own account. A commercial agent generally negotiates or concludes transactions on behalf of the foreign principal and receives commission.
Generally, yes. A genuine distributor operates an independent resale business. However, excessive control, misleading representation, or unusual risk allocation may affect the legal assessment.
Yes, where the agent has been granted the necessary authority. The extent and formal requirements of that authority should be clearly documented.
The supplier may generally recommend a price or establish a genuine maximum price, but imposing fixed or minimum resale prices may violate Turkish competition law.
Ordinarily no. A distributor earns a resale margin. A commercial agent normally receives commission.
Yes. The agent may claim unpaid commission, damages, notice-related compensation, post-termination commission, and goodwill indemnity where the legal requirements are satisfied.
Potentially. An exclusive distributor may seek goodwill indemnity by analogy where the relationship, customer development, continuing supplier benefit, and equitable circumstances justify such a claim.
Generally, parties to an international agreement may select foreign law. However, mandatory Turkish rules, competition law, public policy, tax, customs, agency protection, and other overriding provisions may still affect the relationship.
Commercial agency may create greater risk where the agent habitually concludes contracts or plays the principal role in concluding them. The result depends on the facts and applicable tax treaty.
Neither model is universally safer. Distribution provides greater commercial separation, while agency offers greater control and direct customer access. The appropriate structure depends on products, regulatory requirements, tax planning, risk allocation, and long-term market strategy.
Choosing between a Turkish distributor and a commercial agent is a strategic legal decision, not merely a sales decision. An unsuitable structure may lead to unexpected tax exposure, competition-law investigations, customer liability, commission claims, goodwill indemnity, trademark disputes, and costly termination proceedings.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises foreign manufacturers, exporters, technology companies, investors, suppliers, and multinational businesses on:
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides transaction-specific legal support for foreign companies establishing, restructuring, or terminating sales networks in the Turkish market.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. The legal classification and consequences of an agency or distributorship relationship depend on the contract, actual commercial practices, allocation of risk, authority, products, market structure, and applicable law.