

Learn when environmental pollution may lead to criminal liability in Turkey, who may be prosecuted within a foreign-owned company, applicable sanctions, investigations, and compliance measures.
Foreign companies operating factories, energy facilities, logistics centers, mines, construction sites, hotels, waste-management plants, chemical facilities, or manufacturing businesses in Turkey must comply with extensive environmental legislation.
An environmental violation may lead to more than an administrative fine. Serious pollution incidents can result in criminal investigations against company executives, factory managers, environmental officers, technical personnel, subcontractors, and other individuals whose conduct contributed to the incident.
Turkey’s environmental enforcement framework principally includes the Turkish Criminal Code, Environmental Law No. 2872, sector-specific regulations, environmental permits, waste rules, emission limits, water-discharge standards, and administrative enforcement procedures. Environmental Law No. 2872 aims to protect the environment under sustainable-environment and sustainable-development principles.
This guide explains the principal criminal risks facing foreign companies in Turkey in 2026.
Yes.
Environmental pollution may constitute a criminal offence when the statutory conditions under the Turkish Criminal Code are satisfied.
The principal offences include:
Administrative enforcement and criminal proceedings may arise from the same incident because they serve different legal purposes.
Article 181 of the Turkish Criminal Code regulates intentional pollution of the environment.
A person may face criminal liability where waste or residues are intentionally released into soil, water, or air contrary to legally prescribed technical procedures and in a manner capable of harming the environment.
The basic form of this offence carries a prison sentence of six months to two years.
The offence does not necessarily require proof that the suspect specifically intended to destroy the environment. It may be sufficient to establish that the person knowingly performed the prohibited act under circumstances satisfying the statutory elements.
Article 181 also addresses the unauthorized introduction of waste or residues into Turkey.
A person who unlawfully brings waste or residues into the country may face imprisonment from one to three years.
This is particularly important for foreign companies engaged in:
A shipment described commercially as recyclable raw material may still create criminal exposure if customs declarations, environmental permissions, waste codes, composition reports, or import authorizations are inaccurate.
More severe penalties may apply where the relevant waste or substance has characteristics capable of:
The technical composition of the substance is therefore critical.
Chemical testing, laboratory analysis, environmental sampling, and expert evidence often determine whether an aggravated form of the offence is alleged.
A pollution incident does not need to be intentional for criminal liability to arise.
Article 182 of the Turkish Criminal Code regulates negligent environmental pollution. A person who negligently causes waste or residues to be released into soil, water, or air in a manner harmful to the environment may face a judicial fine.
Where the pollution leaves a persistent effect, imprisonment from two months to one year may be imposed. If the waste is capable of causing difficult-to-treat illnesses, reproductive harm, or changes to the natural characteristics of animals or plants, imprisonment from one to five years may apply.
Negligent liability may arise from failures such as:
Under Turkish criminal law, criminal responsibility is principally personal.
This means that criminal prosecution is generally directed against natural persons who committed, ordered, authorized, facilitated, or negligently failed to prevent the unlawful conduct.
Potential suspects may include:
However, this does not mean that the company itself is legally unaffected.
For certain forms of intentional environmental pollution, security measures specific to legal entities may be imposed. Article 181 expressly permits legal-entity security measures in relation to specified aggravated conduct.
A company may also face administrative penalties, suspension of operations, permit consequences, cleanup obligations, compensation claims, reputational damage, and contractual disputes.
Yes.
A foreign director, shareholder representative, regional manager, or expatriate executive may be investigated if there is evidence connecting that person to the alleged offence.
Nationality does not create immunity.
Criminal exposure may arise where the executive:
A title alone does not automatically establish guilt. Prosecutors must examine the person’s actual authority, duties, knowledge, conduct, and connection to the incident.
Not automatically.
A passive shareholder is not generally criminally liable merely because the company caused environmental pollution.
Criminal liability requires an individualized assessment of the person’s conduct.
However, a shareholder who actively manages the business, gives operational instructions, approves unlawful practices, or participates in concealing the incident may face investigation.
Responsibility cannot lawfully be allocated only by corporate title or nationality.
Investigators may examine the entire decision-making chain, including:
A foreign parent company’s executive may therefore become relevant where decisions made abroad directly contributed to pollution in Turkey.
Yes.
More than one person may be investigated where different individuals contributed to the offence.
For example:
Each person’s liability must be examined separately.
Environmental violations may also result in administrative sanctions under Environmental Law No. 2872.
The Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change publishes the relevant environmental legislation and enforcement framework.
Administrative consequences may include:
The 2026 environmental administrative fines were updated through the Communiqué on Administrative Fines Under Environmental Law No. 2872, published in the Official Gazette dated December 30, 2025. The adjusted amounts apply from January 1, 2026.
Because fine amounts vary significantly according to the violation, facility, substance, location, vessel, activity, and repetition history, the exact amount should be calculated under the provision applicable to the specific incident.
Yes.
A company may face administrative sanctions while individual managers or employees face criminal investigation arising from the same incident.
There may also be parallel:
Payment of an administrative fine does not necessarily terminate a criminal investigation.
Foreign companies should pay particular attention to operations involving:
High-risk sectors require strict documentation, monitoring, employee training, contractor control, and emergency-response procedures.
A criminal investigation may begin following:
The public prosecutor may instruct police, gendarmerie, environmental authorities, or technical experts to collect evidence.
Investigators may collect:
Foreign companies should preserve these materials immediately after discovering a pollution event.
Deleting, altering, concealing, or fabricating records may significantly worsen the legal position and may create additional criminal allegations.
Yes.
Environmental pollution cases frequently depend on technical expert analysis.
Experts may assess:
A defense lawyer may challenge an incomplete or inaccurate expert report and request additional sampling, laboratory testing, or a new expert panel.
Yes.
Companies frequently outsource waste transportation, recycling, treatment, laboratory testing, or disposal.
However, using a subcontractor does not automatically eliminate the main company’s responsibilities.
Risk may arise where the company:
Contracts should clearly allocate environmental duties, but contractual clauses cannot eliminate criminal responsibility imposed by law.
An accident does not automatically exclude liability.
Authorities will examine whether the incident resulted from:
A genuinely unforeseeable and unavoidable event may support the defense. An incident caused by preventable operational failures may lead to negligent criminal liability.
Possessing an environmental permit does not provide complete immunity.
A permit only protects activities conducted within its scope and conditions.
Criminal or administrative liability may still arise where:
Environmental permits must be treated as ongoing compliance obligations rather than one-time approvals.
Potentially, yes.
Where environmental pollution causes bodily injury, disease, poisoning, or death, prosecutors may consider additional offences depending on intent, negligence, causation, and the facts.
Academic analysis of Article 181 notes that where a person’s health is separately harmed, intentional or negligent injury offences may also require consideration.
Medical and scientific causation is often one of the most disputed issues in these cases.
Yes, provided that the requirements of Turkish criminal procedure are satisfied.
During an investigation, authorities may seek to search:
Documents, samples, devices, and electronic records may be seized where legally justified.
A company should obtain immediate legal representation during a search and preserve a detailed record of all materials taken.
Yes.
Environmental authorities may order operations to stop where statutory conditions are satisfied, especially where activities present serious environmental risks or operate without required permits.
A criminal investigation can therefore create an immediate business-continuity problem even before a criminal court judgment is issued.
Not always.
Where a foreign executive becomes a suspect, a court may impose judicial-control measures, including a prohibition on leaving Turkey, depending on the seriousness of the allegations and procedural risks.
Foreign executives should obtain legal advice before traveling after learning of an investigation.
The company should act immediately and lawfully.
Important steps include:
The company should avoid uncoordinated internal interviews or speculative admissions before the relevant technical facts are established.
An effective environmental compliance system should include:
Compliance should be implemented in practice. Written policies that are routinely ignored may provide little protection.
Foreign investors acquiring Turkish companies should conduct environmental due diligence before closing the transaction.
The review should cover:
Environmental liabilities may predate the investment but create major financial and operational consequences after acquisition.
A lawyer experienced in Turkish criminal and environmental law can:
Early legal representation is especially important where pollution is ongoing, evidence is being collected, or foreign executives may face travel restrictions.
Criminal proceedings generally focus on responsible individuals, but legal-entity-specific security measures may apply in certain cases. The company may also face substantial administrative, operational, and civil consequences.
Yes, where the evidence proves that the director personally committed, ordered, facilitated, or negligently caused an environmental offence.
No. Turkish law separately regulates intentional and negligent environmental pollution.
Yes. Imprisonment may apply where negligent pollution causes persistent environmental effects or involves particularly dangerous waste or residues.
Not necessarily. Administrative fines and criminal proceedings are separate legal mechanisms.
Yes. Liability may arise if the company failed to verify, supervise, or properly control the contractor’s activities.
No. Activities outside permit conditions, unlawful discharges, or false reporting may still result in liability.
Yes. Operations may be suspended or closed where statutory conditions are met.
Potentially. A court may impose a travel restriction where justified by the circumstances of the criminal investigation.
The company should stop ongoing harm, preserve evidence, comply with notification duties, engage environmental experts, and obtain immediate legal advice.
Environmental investigations can expose foreign companies to criminal prosecution, administrative fines, facility closures, compensation claims, permit consequences, and serious reputational damage.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office represents foreign companies, international investors, directors, plant managers, environmental officers, logistics operators, manufacturers, and technical personnel in environmental criminal investigations and regulatory proceedings in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in environmental pollution allegations, unlawful waste importation, hazardous-waste investigations, factory searches, executive interviews, expert-report objections, administrative sanctions, and related criminal proceedings.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
This publication provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. Environmental criminal liability must be assessed according to the facts, permits, technical evidence, applicable legislation, and procedural status of each case.