

A practical guide for foreign creditors collecting maritime debts in Turkey through ship arrest, enforcement proceedings, litigation, arbitration awards, and recognition of foreign judgments.
Foreign shipowners, bunker suppliers, charterers, freight forwarders, insurers, shipyards, crew members, and maritime service providers may recover unpaid maritime debts against debtors or vessels located in Turkey.
Successful recovery depends on identifying the debtor’s assets quickly, determining whether the claim qualifies as a maritime claim, and choosing the correct enforcement method.
Common claims include:
Under the Turkish Commercial Code, a vessel may be provisionally arrested only for claims classified as maritime claims under Article 1352. Ordinary commercial debts that fall outside this statutory list cannot generally support the arrest of a vessel.
The creditor must present documents making the existence and maritime nature of the claim sufficiently credible. Useful evidence may include:
Depending on the claim and ownership position, arrest may be requested against:
Associated-vessel arrest requires careful examination of registered ownership. Similar management, branding, or beneficial ownership alone may not always be sufficient.
A court may require the applicant to provide counter-security before granting provisional arrest. The amount and form may depend on the claim, supporting evidence, international treaties, and the creditor’s nationality or residence.
The creditor should therefore prepare both the arrest application and the necessary bank guarantee or cash security in advance.
Where the debtor owns assets in Turkey, the creditor may commence enforcement proceedings against:
If the debtor objects to an ordinary payment order, the creditor may need to file an action for annulment of objection or pursue another appropriate court remedy.
Commercial lawsuits seeking payment, compensation, annulment of objection, negative declaratory relief, or restitution generally require an application to mandatory mediation before litigation. This requirement applies to relevant maritime commercial disputes as well.
Urgent provisional measures, including ship arrest applications, should be assessed separately and may be sought without waiting for the merits proceedings to conclude.
A foreign judgment is not automatically enforceable in Turkey. The creditor generally needs a Turkish court decision granting enforcement under the Turkish Private International Law framework.
The process may require:
The Turkish International Private and Procedural Law governs jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.
Foreign maritime arbitration awards may be enforced in Turkey under the New York Convention or applicable Turkish legislation.
The debtor may resist enforcement on limited grounds, including:
A creditor may also seek protective measures against assets while enforcement proceedings are pending, where the legal requirements are satisfied.
Maritime claims may be subject to short limitation or extinguishing periods. The applicable period depends on whether the debt arises from carriage, chartering, collision, salvage, insurance, employment, repair, or another maritime transaction.
Foreign creditors should not rely only on negotiations because continued correspondence may not automatically stop the limitation period.
Before taking action, verify:
Yes. A foreign creditor may use Turkish courts, enforcement offices, arbitration-enforcement procedures, and provisional remedies.
No. The debt must qualify as a maritime claim listed under the Turkish Commercial Code.
An urgent application may be decided rapidly where the vessel is present and the creditor provides sufficient evidence and security.
Potentially, but the ownership and personal-liability conditions must be satisfied.
No. A Turkish enforcement judgment is generally required first.
Yes, provided the applicable international and Turkish enforcement requirements are met.
For many commercial monetary lawsuits, mediation is a precondition. Urgent provisional measures require separate analysis.
Bank accounts, receivables, shares, real estate, vehicles, machinery, and vessels may be attached where legally owned by the debtor.
Delay. A vessel may leave Turkish jurisdiction quickly, while limitation periods and insolvency risks may reduce recovery prospects.
Usually yes, unless advance notice would create a risk that the vessel or other assets will disappear.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign maritime creditors with debt analysis, demand letters, ship arrest, enforcement proceedings, asset searches, mediation, commercial litigation, and the enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitration awards.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Maritime debt recovery depends on the claim, debtor, vessel ownership, evidence, limitation period, and available assets.