

The important point for a foreign buyer is:
Buying land without road access does not automatically create a road, but qualifying landlocked property may potentially obtain a legally protected right of passage through agreement or court proceedings.
A parcel is commonly described as landlocked when it does not have adequate legal access to a public road.
For example:
Public road → Parcel A → Parcel B → Foreign buyer’s Parcel C
If Parcel C has no independent connection with the public road, the owner may need to cross Parcel A or B.
However, physical access and legal access must be distinguished.
A tractor path may physically exist while the foreign owner has no registered right to use it.
This is one of the most important due-diligence issues for foreign buyers.
A road visible on the ground may be:
The legal status should be established from official records.
That statement should never be accepted without verification.
Suppose a seller takes a foreign investor to a parcel using a four-meter dirt road and says:
“This road belongs to the property.”
After purchasing the land, the foreign buyer discovers that the entire route belongs to three neighboring landowners.
Those neighbors then install a gate.
The buyer may have two different legal problems:
Access dispute with neighboring owners
and potentially
Claims arising from representations made during the sale.
Before considering litigation, determine whether an access easement already exists.
The title records should be examined for rights benefiting the property, including a registered right of passage.
If an existing registered easement provides adequate access, the issue may not require establishment of a new right.
Instead, the problem may involve interference with an existing property right.
The cadastral map should then be examined.
Important questions include:
This analysis should be completed before deciding whom to sue.
Foreign investors should be particularly careful with undeveloped land.
A development plan may show a future road beside the property.
That does not necessarily mean that the road has already been physically opened and legally implemented.
Therefore distinguish:
Road shown in planning documents
from
existing legally usable public road.
This distinction can materially affect both property value and development feasibility.
A compulsory right of passage is a property-law mechanism designed to provide adequate access where a parcel lacks sufficient connection to a public road.
Rather than transferring ownership of the neighboring strip to the foreign buyer, the procedure generally establishes an easement allowing passage over a defined route.
The neighboring owner remains the owner of the land.
The benefiting parcel receives a legally protected access right.
No.
The compulsory-passage mechanism is based on compensation.
The owner whose land is burdened by the passage is entitled to compensation determined according to the applicable legal and valuation principles.
Therefore:
Compulsory passage ≠ free acquisition of neighboring land.
The foreign owner should include the expected compensation in the financial analysis of the property.
Potentially, yes.
The fact that the buyer voluntarily purchased land without direct road access does not by itself mean that a compulsory-passage mechanism can never be considered.
The legal analysis focuses on matters such as:
However, buying a landlocked parcel should never be treated as guaranteeing that the owner will receive exactly the route desired.
Suppose the foreign owner’s parcel is surrounded by four properties.
The owner prefers to cross Parcel A because it gives the shortest route to the main highway.
But crossing Parcel A would divide a residential garden and pass beside a house.
Parcel B provides a somewhat longer route through undeveloped land.
The court is not necessarily required to select Parcel A merely because the foreign owner prefers it.
Route selection must consider both access necessity and the burden imposed on neighboring properties.
A central principle in compulsory-passage disputes is avoiding unnecessary damage to the burdened property.
The technical investigation may compare several routes.
For example:
| Route | Length | Affected Area | Main Issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route A | 55 m | 165 m² | Crosses residential garden |
| Route B | 80 m | 240 m² | Crosses undeveloped land |
| Route C | 95 m | 285 m² | Requires two neighboring parcels |
The shortest route is not automatically the correct route.
The historical relationship among the parcels can also become relevant.
Suppose one large property originally had direct road access.
The owner later divided it into four parcels and sold the rear parcel without providing an access route.
That history may be important when determining where the compulsory passage should be located.
Therefore, obtain historical cadastral and ownership information where the origin of the landlocked condition is relevant.
The clearest situation is where the parcel has no usable legal connection to a public road.
For example, the foreign buyer’s property is surrounded entirely by privately owned parcels.
This presents a classic access problem.
The issue can also arise where some access exists but is objectively insufficient for the legitimate needs of the property.
For example, a narrow path may exist, but the owner argues that it cannot reasonably accommodate the lawful agricultural use of the parcel.
However:
Inconvenient access is not automatically inadequate access.
The claimant must establish genuine necessity.
A compulsory right of passage restricts someone else’s property.
Therefore, it should not become a mechanism for obtaining a more convenient route merely because the foreign owner prefers it.
A buyer generally cannot say:
“I already have legal access from the north, but the southern route would save me five minutes, so my neighbor must give me a road.”
The existing access must be examined objectively.
There is no universal road width automatically available to every property owner.
The appropriate width depends on legitimate need.
Relevant considerations can include:
A claimant seeking an unusually wide route should be prepared to explain why it is necessary.
Foreign buyers frequently encounter access problems after purchasing agricultural parcels.
A narrow pedestrian path may not be sufficient for legitimate agricultural machinery.
Technical evidence may therefore address:
The court should nevertheless avoid imposing a broader easement than the legitimate access need requires.
Suppose a foreign buyer purchases a parcel for a detached house.
The property does not directly touch a public road.
The owner may require ordinary vehicle and pedestrian access.
But this does not automatically entitle the owner to demand a wide boulevard across the neighboring parcel.
The route and width must remain proportionate to the legally established need.
A foreign company may purchase land intended for a commercial project and later discover that access is inadequate.
This can become particularly expensive because project feasibility may depend on:
A compulsory private passage easement should not automatically be assumed to solve every planning or development-access requirement.
The project’s administrative requirements should be investigated separately.
Obtaining a private right of passage does not automatically mean the property becomes legally buildable.
Separate issues may include:
Foreign investors should therefore avoid buying land on the assumption:
“If I win a passage lawsuit, I can definitely build.”
That conclusion may be incorrect.
A court will usually require technical examination of the properties.
A survey expert may identify:
The court can then compare the alternatives.
An on-site inspection can be especially important.
Maps alone may not reveal:
A route that appears ideal on paper may be impractical on the ground.
The owner receiving the passage must generally compensate the owner whose land becomes burdened.
The valuation should reflect the actual effect of the easement.
Factors may include:
An expert valuation may be required.
Suppose a three-meter-wide passage requires 100 meters across a neighboring parcel.
The easement affects 300 square meters.
The financial analysis cannot necessarily be reduced to:
300 m² × average land price.
The easement may affect the neighboring parcel’s overall use or value differently.
Expert valuation is therefore important.
Right-of-passage proceedings may continue long enough for property values to change substantially.
An outdated valuation can become problematic.
Where necessary, current valuation evidence should be obtained so that the compensation corresponds appropriately with the conditions relevant to the final decision.
Foreign buyers considering landlocked property should estimate:
Purchase price + Legal expenses + Survey costs + Compensation for passage + Road construction + Potential infrastructure costs.
A “cheap” parcel can become much more expensive once legal access is included.
The correct neighboring owners must be identified.
Do not rely on:
Obtain current title records.
The neighboring property may be owned by:
Procedural mistakes can substantially delay the case.
Sometimes one neighboring parcel cannot provide complete connection to the public road.
The proposed passage may need to cross two or more properties.
The relevant owners must then be considered in the proceedings, and the technical route should provide continuous access all the way to the public road.
A passage that merely reaches another landlocked parcel does not solve the problem.
The final route should provide an effective legal connection to a public road.
This should be verified technically before litigation.
Yes.
A negotiated easement can often be faster and less expensive than litigation.
The parties can potentially agree on:
For a permanent solution, however, the legal formalities and title-registry requirements should be completed properly.
A neighboring owner may say:
“You can always use my road.”
Years later that property may be sold.
The new owner may disagree.
A foreign investor spending substantial money on real estate should generally seek a legally secure and appropriately registered access arrangement rather than relying on personal goodwill.
This is a common risk.
The seller may have crossed the neighbor’s land for twenty years because the families were friends.
The buyer assumes the road belongs to the parcel.
After the sale, the neighbor refuses access.
Personal permission given to the seller should not automatically be treated as a permanent property right benefiting the buyer.
The foreign buyer may have additional remedies if road access was materially misrepresented.
Important evidence can include:
Depending on the circumstances, the access problem may therefore generate both a neighboring-property dispute and a contractual dispute.
Do not rely exclusively on this statement.
The legal status should be independently verified.
Preserve any written representation if it later proves incorrect.
In development projects, a brochure may show roads connecting individual plots.
Foreign buyers should verify whether those roads are:
A drawing in a brochure does not by itself establish a permanent property right.
Suppose the foreign-owned parcel already benefits from a registered easement, but the neighbor installs a gate and prevents use.
The issue is then different.
The owner may not need to establish a new compulsory passage. Instead, judicial protection of the existing registered easement may be appropriate.
Obtain the precise registry entry and route documentation.
A neighboring owner may retain legitimate security interests, but any arrangement must respect an existing legally enforceable passage right.
If a gate effectively makes the easement unusable, the foreign owner may need to seek protection against interference.
Document repeated obstruction with photographs and videos.
Even if the owner believes the access obstruction is unlawful, forcibly damaging the neighbor’s gate can create an additional dispute.
Use appropriate legal remedies rather than self-help.
Depending on the circumstances, interim judicial protection may be evaluated where complete lack of access creates urgent and serious consequences.
But temporary access should not be assumed to be automatic.
The court will consider the legal basis, evidence, urgency and effects on both properties.
Not automatically.
A passage easement and utility easements are not necessarily identical.
Installation of:
may require separate rights, permissions or administrative procedures.
Foreign buyers should investigate utility access independently.
Establishment of the easement does not necessarily mean the neighboring owner must construct a finished road for the foreign buyer.
Physical road construction, maintenance and improvement can involve separate legal and administrative issues.
The judgment or agreement should be reviewed before undertaking work on the neighboring property.
A permanent passage solution should be properly reflected in the title registry.
This protects the legal relationship between the benefiting and burdened properties and reduces dependence on the personal identities of current owners.
Registration is particularly important before:
A bank considering land as collateral may investigate whether the parcel has lawful access.
Lack of road access can reduce:
Foreign buyers financing property should therefore investigate access before signing the final sale.
A foreign owner may eventually discover that the absence of road access makes the property difficult to sell.
Prospective buyers may ask:
Is there a registered road?
Is there an easement?
Is litigation pending?
How much compensation will be required?
Resolving the access problem can materially improve legal certainty.
Foreign nationality does not itself prevent a registered property owner from relying on the ordinary property-law mechanisms available for protecting and using the property.
The key questions concern the parcel and surrounding properties rather than nationality:
The owner may potentially pursue the process through an appropriately authorized representative.
Depending on the case, representation can cover:
Formal requirements for a power of attorney executed outside Turkey depend on the jurisdiction and manner of execution.
Foreign buyers should investigate at least the following before purchase:
These questions should be answered before paying the purchase price whenever possible.
Certainly from a commercial perspective, legal access is a significant property characteristic.
A landlocked parcel can require substantial additional expenditure and litigation.
Foreign investors should therefore incorporate access risk into valuation and negotiations rather than treating the issue as a minor technical detail.
There is no automatic rule that every purchase of land without road access can simply be cancelled.
Potential remedies against the seller depend on factors including:
The sales file should be reviewed separately from the right-of-passage claim.
As of 2026, the fundamental Civil Code framework governing compulsory passage remains the relevant legal mechanism for private properties lacking adequate access to a public road. Article 747 is the central statutory provision.
The compulsory-passage mechanism balances two property interests: the foreign owner’s need to make reasonable use of a landlocked property and the neighboring owner’s right not to have their land unnecessarily burdened.
Accordingly, the typical sequence is:
Check public-road connection → Check registered easements → Examine parcel history → Survey alternative routes → Identify affected owners → Establish genuine access need → Determine the least burdensome appropriate route → Value the easement → Pay the required compensation → Obtain and register the passage right.
Foreign buyers should not assume that buying landlocked property guarantees the route, width or price they prefer.
Potentially yes. Where the property lacks adequate access to a public road, the Civil Code’s compulsory-passage mechanism may allow an easement to be established over neighboring property subject to the statutory requirements and compensation.
Not automatically. The route should satisfy the genuine access need while taking into account the burden imposed on neighboring properties.
No. A compulsory passage is established in return for compensation to the owner whose property is burdened.
No. Determine whether the road is public, privately owned or protected by a registered easement. Physical use alone does not necessarily establish a permanent access right.
Potentially, where vehicle access is objectively required by the property’s legitimate use. The necessary width and route require case-specific technical assessment.
Where the statutory conditions exist and voluntary agreement fails, a compulsory right-of-passage lawsuit may be considered.
Potentially yes, where necessary to provide continuous access to a public road. The affected properties and owners must be properly identified.
Potentially, depending on the sales contract, representations, buyer’s knowledge and other circumstances. Seller liability should be analyzed separately from the passage lawsuit.
Not necessarily. Planning status, building-permit requirements, road frontage and infrastructure rules are separate issues.
Yes. Legal road access should be a core part of real-estate due diligence. A visible track or seller’s verbal assurance should not replace review of title, cadastral and planning records.
Purchasing land without legally secured road access can substantially affect its market value, development potential, mortgageability and resale prospects. The problem becomes especially serious where the seller represented a private road as public access or where neighboring owners close an informal route immediately after the sale.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign individuals, investors and companies facing road-access, easement, cadastral and neighboring-property disputes in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign property owners with title and cadastral investigations, assessment of existing easements, compulsory right-of-passage lawsuits, alternative-route analysis, compensation disputes, negotiations with neighboring owners, protection of existing passage rights and claims arising from misleading representations concerning road access during a property purchase.
Early legal and technical review is particularly important before beginning construction or development, where several neighboring parcels may be affected, where the seller promised road access that does not legally exist, or where the owner intends to mortgage or resell the land.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
This publication is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Whether a compulsory right of passage can be established, where it will be located and what compensation must be paid depend on the cadastral records, surrounding parcels, existing access, property history, legitimate use, technical alternatives and evidence in the individual case.