

A 2026 legal guide to image rights licensing agreements for international athletes in Turkey, covering sponsorships, club use, social media, trademarks, AI-generated images, merchandising, exclusivity, taxation, personal data, termination, and unauthorized commercial use.
Professional athletes are no longer commercially valuable only because of their sporting performance. Their name, photograph, face, likeness, voice, signature, nickname, jersey number, social media identity, personal brand, and public reputation may generate substantial commercial revenue independently from their salary.
For international athletes competing or conducting commercial activities in Turkey, these assets may be used in sponsorship campaigns, advertisements, social media, merchandise, club promotions, video games, mobile applications, documentaries, trading cards, digital platforms, and increasingly artificial intelligence-generated content.
This creates an important legal question:
Who has the right to commercially exploit an international athlete’s image in Turkey?
The answer is rarely as simple as “the club” or “the athlete.”
Turkish law does not regulate all commercial image rights through one standalone “image rights statute.” Protection can arise through several overlapping areas, including personality rights, intellectual property law, contract law, unfair competition principles, advertising regulation, personal data protection, and sports regulations.
Article 86 of Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works provides an important statutory foundation: pictures and portraits generally cannot be exhibited or otherwise disclosed to the public without the consent of the person depicted, subject to specified exceptions. The same provision preserves protections arising under Article 24 of the Turkish Civil Code. (Dünya Fikri Mülkiyet Örgütü)
For international athletes and the businesses contracting with them, a carefully drafted image rights licensing agreement is therefore essential.
In commercial sports practice, “image rights” is used as a broad expression covering the commercial exploitation of attributes identifying an athlete.
Depending on the agreement, these can include:
Not every element is necessarily protected under exactly the same legal rule.
A properly drafted agreement should therefore identify each licensed asset instead of simply stating that “all image rights” are transferred.
Yes.
Article 86 of Law No. 5846 provides that pictures and portraits generally may not be exhibited or otherwise disclosed publicly without the consent of the depicted person, subject to statutory exceptions such as certain current-event uses. (Dünya Fikri Mülkiyet Örgütü)
Personality rights under the Turkish Civil Code provide an additional layer of protection.
Consequently, the fact that an athlete is famous does not mean that their face can automatically be used to sell products.
This distinction is extremely important.
Professional athletes are public figures, and photographs taken during public sporting events may sometimes be lawfully used in circumstances connected with reporting current events.
However, editorial use and commercial endorsement are fundamentally different questions.
A newspaper publishing a match photograph is not equivalent to a company placing the same athlete’s face on a billboard suggesting that the athlete endorses its products.
Article 86 contains exceptions relating to certain public figures and current events, but it expressly preserves personality-right protections. (Dünya Fikri Mülkiyet Örgütü)
A brand should therefore never assume that an athlete’s celebrity status creates unrestricted commercial licensing rights.
An image rights licensing agreement authorizes another party to use specified aspects of the athlete’s identity for defined purposes.
The licensee could be:
a sports club, sponsor, sportswear company, broadcaster, video-game publisher, advertising agency, merchandise company, digital platform, event organizer, or another commercial partner.
The agreement should determine exactly what the licensee can and cannot do.
One of the first drafting questions concerns the nature of the rights granted.
In most commercial arrangements, the athlete does not need to surrender permanent control over their identity.
Instead, the agreement can provide a limited license covering specified:
uses, products, territories, media, campaigns, and periods.
Broad language purporting to transfer every present and future right permanently should be reviewed particularly carefully.
International athletes joining Turkish clubs should distinguish between individual image rights and collective team-related promotional rights.
A club may reasonably require the ability to use an athlete’s photograph for matters such as:
That does not necessarily mean the club should automatically receive unrestricted authority to license the athlete individually to third-party advertisers.
The player contract and separate image-rights agreement should define the boundary.
Potentially, yes, particularly where the player’s contract or another agreement grants appropriate rights.
However, the permitted use should be defined.
A provision allowing the club to use an athlete’s image for club promotion should not automatically be interpreted as authorization for every unrelated third-party commercial campaign.
High-value athletes should carefully examine clauses granting clubs sublicensing authority.
A common dispute occurs when a club sponsor wants individual athletes to appear in advertising.
Suppose an international footballer signs with a Turkish club whose principal sponsor is a financial company.
The sponsor wants the athlete to appear alone in a nationwide advertising campaign.
The club’s sponsorship rights do not necessarily establish that the club can grant such an individual endorsement.
The athlete’s contractual arrangements must be reviewed.
Clubs frequently negotiate broader rights for collective promotional use.
For example, a contract might distinguish between:
individual athlete advertising and campaigns featuring several members of the squad.
The precise distinction should be defined contractually.
Otherwise, a sponsor might attempt to construct a nominally “team-based” campaign that commercially focuses almost entirely on one internationally recognized athlete.
Athletes can also license image rights directly to sponsors.
A sponsorship agreement may authorize use in:
television advertisements, social media, billboards, digital advertising, websites, packaging, promotional events, and point-of-sale materials.
The agreement should identify each authorized category.
A generic clause allowing use “for all advertising purposes worldwide forever” can create substantial long-term risk for the athlete.
International athletes have commercial value across multiple jurisdictions.
A Turkish sponsor may need rights only in Turkey.
Granting worldwide rights unnecessarily can interfere with existing or future sponsorships elsewhere.
Licenses can therefore be limited to:
Turkey, specified countries, a region, or worldwide territory, depending on the commercial transaction.
Image rights should not remain commercially exploitable indefinitely unless that is genuinely intended.
The agreement should specify:
Automatic renewal provisions should also be examined carefully.
This is one of the most frequently overlooked provisions.
Suppose a foreign athlete leaves a Turkish club.
Can the club continue selling merchandise containing the athlete’s photograph?
Can a sponsor continue running an old advertisement?
Can previously published social media posts remain online?
The agreement should answer these questions before the relationship ends.
Immediate destruction of every product after termination may be commercially unrealistic.
Parties can therefore negotiate a limited sell-off period for inventory already manufactured.
The period, quantities, territories, and royalty treatment should be clearly defined.
Modern athlete licensing agreements must specifically address social media.
The agreement should determine whether the sponsor can:
repost athlete content, tag the athlete, use photographs in paid advertisements, boost posts, create sponsored stories, use content on third-party platforms, or retain posts after the campaign ends.
Paid-media usage is particularly important because it can dramatically extend the commercial reach of an athlete’s image.
Some endorsement agreements require the athlete personally to publish content.
The contract should specify:
number of posts, platforms, timing, content format, disclosure obligations, approval procedure, required hashtags, campaign links, and duration for which posts must remain visible.
Vague obligations such as “reasonable social media support” frequently create disputes.
Commercial athlete endorsements must also comply with Turkish advertising law.
If an athlete receives payment or another commercial benefit for promotional content, the commercial character of the communication may need to be appropriately disclosed.
Image rights licensing and advertising compliance are therefore related but separate issues.
Obtaining permission to use the athlete’s face does not automatically make the resulting advertisement lawful.
International athletes frequently have multiple sponsors.
An agreement should define the sponsor’s protected product category carefully.
For example, “sportswear” could include:
shoes, performance clothing, casual clothing, accessories, equipment, wearable technology, or several unrelated product groups.
Overly broad exclusivity can prevent an athlete from entering valuable future partnerships.
Contracts should define what constitutes a competitor.
If an athlete signs with a sports drink company, does exclusivity prevent:
Ambiguity can become expensive.
Before signing a Turkish image rights agreement, international athletes should disclose relevant existing commercial commitments.
The new agreement should be checked against:
personal sponsorships, club sponsorships, federation agreements, national-team sponsorships, equipment contracts, and previous image licenses.
The athlete should avoid granting rights already exclusively licensed elsewhere.
A foreign athlete playing for a Turkish club may simultaneously represent their national team.
National-team commercial rights can be subject to separate federation agreements.
A Turkish sponsor should not assume that rights obtained through the athlete or club extend to photographs showing national-team uniforms, trademarks, or competition imagery.
Professional competitions may impose additional commercial rules.
League logos, tournament footage, official match photographs, broadcast footage, and competition trademarks may belong to parties other than the athlete.
An athlete can generally license only rights they actually control.
Another important distinction concerns the photograph itself.
The athlete may control commercial use of their likeness, while a photographer or agency may hold intellectual property rights in the photograph.
Therefore, obtaining the athlete’s permission does not automatically provide the right to reproduce any photograph found online.
Both layers of rights should be cleared where necessary.
The same principle applies to video.
A sponsor may have permission from the athlete but not from the broadcaster, producer, league, club, or other owner of the footage.
Commercial use should therefore be analyzed asset by asset.
Athlete images may be used on:
shirts, posters, trading cards, collectibles, calendars, accessories, memorabilia, toys, and digital products.
The agreement should specify whether merchandising is included.
Advertising rights should not automatically be treated as merchandise-production rights.
Athletes can receive compensation through:
fixed licensing fees, royalties, minimum guarantees, performance bonuses, or combinations of these mechanisms.
Where royalties are used, the agreement should define net sales, permitted deductions, reporting periods, payment deadlines, currency, and audit rights.
International athletes licensing valuable merchandising rights should consider contractual audit protections.
Without audit rights, it may be difficult to determine whether the licensee accurately reported sales.
The agreement can specify record-retention obligations and procedures for independent financial review.
An athlete’s commercial identity extends beyond photographs.
Names and nicknames may be commercially valuable.
A sponsor should therefore obtain appropriate rights before using the athlete’s name on:
product lines, advertisements, websites, domain names, promotional campaigns, or merchandise.
High-profile athletes increasingly register their names, initials, personal logos, or slogans as trademarks.
Where registered trademarks are involved, the licensing agreement should distinguish trademark rights from general personality or image rights.
Quality-control provisions may also be appropriate.
An athlete’s image can also engage Turkish personal-data law.
Law No. 6698 defines and regulates personal-data processing, while biometric information constitutes a special category where technical processing enables unique identification. The current Article 6 framework reflects amendments made in 2024 and remains relevant in 2026. (KVKK)
Not every ordinary photograph automatically constitutes biometric data merely because a face appears in it. However, facial images subjected to technical processing for unique identification can raise enhanced biometric-data concerns. Turkish Data Protection Authority decisions have specifically addressed biometric processing and facial-image-related concepts. (KVKK)
This distinction matters.
Contractual permission to use an athlete’s image and compliance with personal-data processing requirements should not simply be treated as interchangeable concepts.
The parties should determine:
what data is processed, for what purpose, on which legal basis, for how long, by whom, and whether it will be transferred to third parties or abroad.
This becomes particularly important for global campaigns.
A multinational sponsor may store campaign assets on servers outside Turkey or provide them to international agencies.
Turkey’s personal-data framework governing transfers abroad was materially revised in 2024.
Consequently, international athlete campaigns should separately examine cross-border data-transfer compliance rather than relying exclusively on the image rights agreement.
Artificial intelligence has created an entirely new category of licensing risk.
A brand may want to use an athlete’s licensed photographs to create:
synthetic advertisements, altered poses, virtual avatars, digital replicas, localized video content, synthetic voice, or AI-generated promotional material.
Traditional image-rights language may not adequately cover these uses.
A particularly important contractual issue in 2026 is whether licensed photographs or recordings can be used to train artificial intelligence systems.
Permission to use an athlete’s photograph in an advertisement should not automatically be assumed to authorize use of that photograph to build a reusable digital model of the athlete.
Modern agreements should separately address:
AI training, model creation, digital replicas, synthetic media, voice cloning, and generative content.
Video games, virtual environments, interactive platforms, and emerging digital services increasingly use realistic athlete avatars.
A license should define whether it covers:
These rights may have substantial independent economic value.
Commercial identity is not limited to visual appearance.
Sponsors increasingly use athlete voices in advertisements and digital applications.
AI technology can now reproduce a person’s voice with remarkable accuracy.
An agreement should therefore distinguish between recorded voice use and permission to create a synthetic voice model.
Sponsors frequently require morality or reputation clauses.
These provisions can permit suspension or termination following serious events involving:
criminal conduct, doping, match manipulation, discriminatory behavior, or specified reputation-damaging conduct.
Athletes should ensure that the clause contains sufficiently objective triggers and appropriate procedures.
A sponsor should not necessarily receive unlimited discretion to terminate simply because an athlete becomes temporarily unpopular online.
Image value can be affected by injury or reduced sporting performance.
Some agreements attempt to reduce compensation if the athlete is unavailable for extended periods.
Such clauses should clearly distinguish:
sporting availability from the athlete’s continuing ability to provide advertising and endorsement services.
An injured athlete may still retain substantial commercial value.
International athletes frequently change clubs.
The agreement should anticipate this possibility.
A personal sponsor may want to continue the relationship, while existing promotional materials might contain the former club’s uniform or trademarks.
The contract should establish procedures for replacing those assets after a transfer.
Leaving a club should not automatically terminate an independent personal sponsorship unless the agreement says so.
Conversely, certain sponsorships may be commercially dependent on the athlete playing for a particular team.
The relationship between the two contracts should therefore be explicitly addressed.
If a company uses an international athlete’s image in Turkey without appropriate authorization, several legal remedies may potentially arise depending on the circumstances.
These can include claims seeking:
cessation of unlawful use, prevention of continued infringement, removal of content, compensation for economic loss, non-material compensation, and other appropriate remedies.
Article 86 of Law No. 5846 specifically restricts unauthorized public disclosure of pictures and portraits and references liability consequences while preserving Turkish Civil Code protections. (Dünya Fikri Mülkiyet Örgütü)
Digital advertising spreads extremely quickly.
An unauthorized campaign involving a famous athlete can reach millions of consumers before ordinary litigation concludes.
Where legally available, urgent judicial measures may therefore become important.
Evidence should first be preserved through screenshots, URLs, campaign records, photographs, and other appropriate methods before unlawful content disappears.
Calculating damages can be complex.
One relevant commercial question may be:
What would the athlete reasonably have charged for the use that occurred?
Other factors can include duration, territory, campaign scale, commercial value, reputational consequences, media exposure, and the nature of the unauthorized association.
High-profile athletes may require expert valuation evidence.
International athlete agreements frequently involve parties from several countries.
The contract should specify governing law.
If Turkish law is selected, the parties should understand how Turkish mandatory rules concerning personality rights, advertising, intellectual property, and data protection interact with contractual freedom.
A foreign-law clause does not necessarily eliminate every mandatory Turkish-law issue where commercial exploitation occurs in Turkey.
High-value image rights contracts should contain carefully drafted dispute-resolution clauses.
Possible mechanisms include:
Turkish courts, institutional arbitration, or another agreed international dispute-resolution mechanism, depending on the relationship.
The agreement should address seat, language, applicable rules, governing law, and enforceability.
Before signing an image rights agreement connected with Turkey, an international athlete should carefully verify:
licensed identity elements, permitted uses, territory, duration, media, social media rights, club rights, sublicensing, individual versus collective use, exclusivity, competitor definitions, merchandise rights, athlete obligations, approval rights, compensation, royalties, audit rights, intellectual property ownership, data processing, international transfers, AI training, digital replicas, synthetic voice, morality clauses, injury provisions, transfer scenarios, termination, post-termination use, dispute resolution, and unauthorized-use remedies.
The agreement should also identify precisely what the athlete is not licensing.
That can be just as important as defining the rights granted.
Yes. Turkish law provides several overlapping protections. In particular, Article 86 of Law No. 5846 generally restricts public disclosure of pictures and portraits without consent, subject to specified exceptions, while Turkish Civil Code personality-right protections remain reserved. (Dünya Fikri Mülkiyet Örgütü)
It depends on the player’s contract and other applicable agreements. A club may have negotiated certain promotional rights, but those rights should not automatically be assumed to include unlimited individual commercial endorsements or sublicensing to third parties.
Only where the necessary rights have been validly obtained. The fact that a company sponsors the athlete’s club does not automatically provide unrestricted individual image rights over every player.
Yes, potentially. However, existing exclusivity and competitor restrictions must be reviewed. Conflicting licenses can expose the athlete to contractual claims.
Only to the extent permitted by the agreement or another applicable legal basis. The contract should specify post-termination removal periods, archived social media, existing advertising materials, and any inventory sell-off period.
Not necessarily. Advertising, merchandising, trademark licensing, social media use, and other forms of commercial exploitation should be separately defined.
This should not be assumed. AI-generated replicas, model training, facial mapping, synthetic voice, and digital avatars can involve uses substantially different from conventional advertising. Modern agreements should expressly regulate them.
Potentially, yes. Depending on the circumstances, Turkish law may provide remedies aimed at stopping unlawful use, preventing further publication, removing content, and obtaining compensation.
An identifiable person’s image can involve personal-data considerations. Where facial images are technically processed to uniquely identify an individual, biometric-data rules may also become relevant. (KVKK)
One of the greatest risks is granting rights that are too broad: worldwide, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, applicable to every commercial medium, and broad enough to cover future technologies such as AI without additional compensation or approval.
For elite athletes, image rights can become one of the most valuable assets of their professional career. A poorly drafted agreement can unintentionally grant a club, sponsor, agency, or commercial partner extensive control over an athlete’s name, face, social media identity, merchandise, digital likeness, or future AI-generated representation.
Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance to international athletes, professional sports clubs, sponsors, agencies, and sports businesses concerning athlete image rights agreements, endorsement contracts, sponsorship licensing, club image rights, merchandising, trademark licensing, social media rights, athlete personality rights, unauthorized advertising, AI-generated athlete content, digital replicas, and sports-related commercial disputes in Turkey.
Before signing a high-value licensing agreement, legal review can help preserve the athlete’s long-term commercial independence, prevent conflicts between club and personal sponsors, define approval and exclusivity rights, protect emerging AI and digital-replica rights, and establish effective remedies against unauthorized commercial exploitation.
For a case-specific legal assessment or the preparation, negotiation, or review of an international athlete image rights licensing agreement in Turkey, you may contact our office.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower No: 148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey