

Planning to sponsor a professional sports team in Turkey? This 2026 legal guide explains sponsorship contracts, tax risks, advertising rules, brand rights, exclusivity, morality clauses, termination, regulatory compliance, and due diligence for foreign sponsors.
Sponsoring a professional sports team in Turkey can provide foreign companies with substantial brand exposure. Football, basketball, volleyball, motorsports, and other professional competitions offer access to large domestic audiences, international broadcasts, digital platforms, stadium advertising, social media, merchandise, and naming-rights opportunities.
However, a sponsorship agreement should not be treated as a simple marketing purchase.
A major sports sponsorship is a sophisticated commercial transaction involving contract law, sports regulation, intellectual property, advertising rules, taxation, competition law, regulatory restrictions, reputation management, data protection, and potentially international sanctions and compliance issues.
For foreign sponsors, the financial exposure can be considerable. A multi-season agreement may require substantial fixed payments while sporting performance, club management, regulatory conditions, broadcasting arrangements, or public reputation can change dramatically during the contractual period.
Turkey’s Revenue Administration issued a dedicated Sponsorship Expenditure Taxation Guide in August 2025, addressing matters such as qualifying sponsorship expenditure, sponsorship agreements, documentation, the distinction between sponsorship and advertising, professional-versus-amateur sports, income and corporate tax treatment, and VAT. This guidance remains particularly relevant for sponsorship structures in 2026. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Foreign businesses should therefore complete legal, tax, and commercial due diligence before signing a Turkish sports sponsorship agreement.
A sports sponsorship agreement generally involves a sponsor providing money, goods, services, or other economic support in exchange for agreed commercial or promotional rights.
Depending on the transaction, the sponsor may receive:
The precise legal characterization matters because Turkish tax treatment may distinguish sponsorship expenditure from ordinary advertising expenditure. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
This distinction is particularly important for foreign companies.
Turkish Revenue Administration guidance distinguishes sponsorship expenditures, which have a prominent social-support element, from advertising expenditures directly connected with generating commercial income.
For example, Turkish tax guidance has treated the placement of a sponsor’s brand, logo, name, or similar commercial identifier on sporting venues, athletes’ clothing, or sporting equipment for direct promotional benefit as potentially having the character of advertising rather than sponsorship. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
The wording used by the parties does not necessarily determine the tax treatment.
Calling a payment “sponsorship” in the contract may therefore be insufficient.
Tax treatment should be reviewed before the commercial budget is finalized.
Under the framework described by the Turkish Revenue Administration, qualifying sponsorship expenditures are deductible at different rates depending on whether the sporting activity is amateur or professional.
For qualifying expenditures:
100% may be deductible for amateur sports, while 50% may be deductible for professional sports, subject to the statutory conditions and applicable tax rules. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
This distinction is extremely important for businesses sponsoring professional teams.
A foreign investor should not assume that the entire sponsorship payment automatically produces a corresponding Turkish tax deduction.
Sponsorship can also create VAT questions.
The Revenue Administration’s sponsorship taxation guidance specifically addresses VAT treatment alongside income and corporate tax consequences. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
The tax treatment can depend on what the sponsor receives in exchange for payment and how the transaction is structured.
A sponsorship involving extensive commercial promotion may therefore require careful analysis of invoices, services, advertising rights, and VAT consequences.
A multinational corporation headquartered outside Turkey may sponsor a Turkish team directly or through:
a Turkish subsidiary, branch, regional entity, distributor, or another group company.
These structures can produce different tax and accounting consequences.
The sponsorship agreement should clearly identify which legal entity is the sponsor and which entity is responsible for payment.
Before paying a substantial sponsorship fee, the foreign company should investigate the club.
Legal due diligence can include:
corporate status, authorized representatives, financial condition, existing sponsorships, litigation, enforcement proceedings, regulatory problems, intellectual property ownership, commercial rights, and restrictions imposed by relevant federations.
The sponsor should verify that the club actually controls the commercial rights it promises to grant.
Law No. 7405 on Sports Clubs and Sports Federations forms a central part of Turkey’s current sports governance framework.
The legislation regulates sports clubs, sports joint-stock companies, their organization and governance, and related financial and administrative matters. (LEXPERA)
Foreign sponsors should therefore identify whether they are contracting with a sports club itself, a sports joint-stock company, or another commercial entity connected with the team.
This distinction can affect authority, payment obligations, and ownership of commercial rights.
A club may not control every advertising asset associated with its team.
Some rights can belong to:
A sponsor should never assume that signing with the club automatically grants every desired right.
Jersey sponsorship is among the most valuable forms of sports advertising.
The contract should specify:
exact logo position, dimensions, colors, home and away kits, training kits, warm-up clothing, replica merchandise, academy teams, women’s teams, domestic competitions, international competitions, and digital representations.
Different competitions may impose different commercial restrictions.
A Turkish team competing internationally may become subject to rules issued by an international federation or competition organizer.
A sponsor acceptable in domestic competition might face different restrictions internationally.
The agreement should therefore address what happens if the sponsor’s branding cannot legally or regulatorily appear during particular matches.
Naming-rights sponsorships can involve stadiums, training facilities, tournaments, or other sporting assets.
These transactions require particularly careful drafting because the sponsor is paying for a close association between its brand and the relevant facility or organization.
Law No. 7405 expressly refers, in a particular public-receivables context, to revenues generated from advertising or sponsorship connected with naming youth or sports facilities, demonstrating the statutory recognition of these commercial revenue streams. (LEXPERA)
The sponsor should determine precisely what intellectual property it may use.
Potential rights include:
club name, crest, logo, photographs, video footage, trademarks, player images, historical marks, slogans, and championship references.
Permission to sponsor a team does not automatically provide unlimited permission to commercially exploit all club intellectual property.
The sponsorship agreement should contain a clearly defined trademark license.
It should address:
territory, duration, media, permitted products, approval procedures, modification restrictions, sublicensing, digital use, and post-termination obligations.
The sponsor should also verify that the club owns or controls the trademarks being licensed.
Using athletes in advertising can create a separate legal issue.
A team sponsorship does not necessarily grant unrestricted rights to use an individual player’s name, image, voice, signature, or likeness.
Player agreements, federation rules, collective arrangements, or individual image-rights structures may limit what the club can grant.
Foreign sponsors planning advertising campaigns featuring specific athletes should verify those rights separately.
Modern sponsorship value increasingly depends on digital exposure.
The agreement should specify:
number of posts, platforms, account ownership, content format, timing, minimum visibility, athlete participation, approval rights, hashtags, links, and paid-media usage.
Promises such as “strong social media promotion” are too vague for a high-value sponsorship agreement.
Category exclusivity can be one of the sponsor’s most valuable rights.
For example, an airline sponsor may want to prevent the club from accepting another airline as a sponsor.
The agreement should define the relevant commercial category precisely.
Overly broad wording can create future disputes.
The contract should regulate what happens if the club signs another sponsor operating in an overlapping sector.
The foreign sponsor may require:
notification rights, approval rights, category exclusivity, termination rights, fee reductions, or compensation.
The meaning of “competitor” should be defined rather than left to interpretation.
Exclusivity is not automatically unlawful.
However, particularly restrictive arrangements can require analysis under Turkish competition law where they materially affect market competition.
Long duration, market position, scope of exclusivity, bundled commercial rights, and restrictions involving competing brands can all become relevant.
High-value sponsorship arrangements should therefore be reviewed for competition-law exposure.
Not every product or service can be promoted freely through professional sport.
Sector-specific advertising restrictions may apply depending on the sponsor’s business.
Foreign sponsors operating in regulated industries should obtain Turkish legal advice before entering the market through sports advertising.
A sponsorship agreement cannot override mandatory advertising law.
Betting-related sponsorship requires particularly careful compliance analysis.
Foreign betting brands should not assume that authorization in another jurisdiction permits advertising or commercial promotion in Turkey.
The legality of the underlying service, Turkish advertising restrictions, sports regulations, and potential criminal or administrative exposure must be reviewed before branding is displayed.
Sponsors operating in industries subject to strict advertising controls must be especially cautious.
A commercial agreement with a club does not create an exemption from Turkish advertising restrictions.
Indirect branding strategies can also create legal risk where authorities consider them an attempt to circumvent mandatory rules.
Financial technology, investment, payment, digital-asset, and crypto-related sponsors can raise additional regulatory questions.
Before a Turkish club promotes such a sponsor, the parties should examine:
licensing, consumer protection, financial promotion, advertising claims, cross-border service restrictions, and applicable regulatory requirements.
Regulatory status should be included in the sponsor’s due diligence.
International sponsors should conduct compliance screening on the club and relevant counterparties.
This can include:
beneficial ownership, directors, related companies, payment recipients, commercial intermediaries, sanctions exposure, anti-money-laundering risks, and reputational issues.
This is particularly important where payments move across several jurisdictions.
Sports sponsorship can create anti-corruption risks where public officials, municipalities, federations, intermediaries, or politically exposed persons are involved.
Foreign companies subject to extraterritorial anti-bribery legislation should maintain documented approval and payment controls.
The sponsorship contract should prohibit improper payments and allow termination for serious compliance violations.
A sponsor should understand exactly where its money is going.
Payments should normally be made to the contractual counterparty through transparent banking channels.
Requests to make payments to:
agents, related companies, personal accounts, offshore entities, or unidentified third parties
should trigger enhanced due diligence.
Sports sponsorship closely associates the sponsor’s reputation with the team.
Problems affecting the club can therefore damage the sponsor.
Potential risks include:
match-fixing allegations, corruption investigations, violence, discriminatory conduct, doping scandals, financial misconduct, regulatory sanctions, or serious misconduct by prominent executives or athletes.
The contract should address these scenarios before they happen.
A carefully drafted morality or reputation clause can protect the sponsor.
The clause can define events allowing suspension or termination where serious conduct materially damages the sponsor’s reputation.
However, vague wording such as “anything damaging our image” can generate uncertainty.
Objective triggers should be used where possible.
A sponsor can suffer major reputational harm if a club becomes involved in an integrity investigation.
The agreement should determine what happens if:
the club, executive, coach, or player becomes subject to a credible match-fixing or corruption investigation.
Possible remedies can include suspension of activation rights, payment suspension, renegotiation, or termination.
Sponsors frequently pay partly for expected sporting exposure.
But what happens if the team:
These possibilities should be addressed contractually.
A professional football team’s commercial value may decline significantly following relegation.
A sponsor may therefore negotiate an automatic reduction in sponsorship fees if the club drops into a lower division.
Without such a clause, poor sporting performance may not automatically allow termination.
The reverse can also apply.
The agreement may provide additional sponsorship payments where the team qualifies for major international competitions or wins championships.
Performance-related payments should use objective and measurable triggers.
Television and streaming exposure can represent a substantial part of sponsorship value.
However, the club may not control broadcasting schedules.
Sponsors should therefore avoid contractual assumptions about guaranteed television exposure unless the club can genuinely deliver the promised rights.
Recent global events have demonstrated the importance of force-majeure provisions in sports contracts.
Potential events include:
natural disasters, public-health emergencies, government restrictions, war, civil unrest, stadium closure, or cancellation of sporting competitions.
The clause should determine whether payments are suspended, reduced, postponed, or refundable.
Foreign sponsors should avoid unnecessarily front-loading substantial multi-season payments.
Possible structures include:
annual installments, seasonal payments, milestone payments, performance-linked payments, and payments conditional on delivery of specific commercial rights.
A well-designed payment structure reduces exposure if the club later fails to perform.
For certain high-value transactions, the sponsor may seek financial protection where substantial advance payments are involved.
Whether a guarantee is commercially feasible depends on the transaction and negotiating power of the parties.
Refund obligations should at minimum be clearly defined.
The agreement should clearly specify when either party may terminate.
Important triggers may include:
material breach, non-payment, regulatory illegality, loss of required authorization, reputational crisis, corruption, sanctions exposure, insolvency, relegation, loss of sponsorship rights, or prolonged force majeure.
Termination without a clear financial mechanism often leads to litigation.
The agreement should determine what happens after termination.
Issues include:
refunds, unpaid installments, removal of branding, return of materials, digital-content removal, intellectual property use, confidentiality, accrued claims, and continuing obligations.
The parties should not wait until the relationship collapses to answer these questions.
Financial distress is a real commercial risk in professional sport.
Before committing to a multi-year sponsorship, the foreign sponsor should investigate whether the club faces serious debt, restructuring, enforcement proceedings, or other financial difficulties.
A financially distressed club may be unable to deliver promised commercial rights throughout the contractual period.
Sports organizations can undergo major governance changes.
A new controlling shareholder or management team may change commercial strategy.
The sponsorship agreement can include protections concerning:
change of control, material restructuring, transfer of commercial rights, or transfer of the team’s operations to another entity.
Cross-border sponsorship contracts should contain a carefully drafted dispute-resolution clause.
Potential options include Turkish courts or arbitration, depending on the transaction.
The clause should specify:
governing law, jurisdiction or arbitral institution, seat of arbitration, language, number of arbitrators, and service provisions.
Foreign sponsors should also consider enforceability before selecting a forum.
International transactions are frequently negotiated in English.
Where Turkish regulatory, operational, or tax documents are also required, bilingual documentation may be commercially useful.
If two language versions are executed, the contract should state which version prevails in case of inconsistency.
Sponsors may receive access to supporter information through competitions, loyalty programs, ticket promotions, or digital campaigns.
This creates data-protection risk.
The sponsorship agreement should identify:
who controls personal data, permitted marketing uses, consent mechanisms, security obligations, international transfers, retention periods, and responsibility for data breaches.
The existence of a sponsorship relationship does not automatically authorize unrestricted use of fan data.
Turkey’s Revenue Administration emphasizes documentation and contractual structure in its sponsorship taxation guidance.
The 2025 guide addresses which expenditures qualify, sponsorship agreements, required documentation, tax deductions, the professional-amateur distinction, and VAT. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Foreign sponsors should therefore maintain complete contracts, invoices, banking records, supporting documentation, and evidence of the sponsorship activities delivered.
One of the most important points for companies sponsoring professional sports in Turkey is the current tax distinction.
Official Turkish tax guidance continues to state that, where statutory conditions are satisfied, qualifying sponsorship expenditure is deductible at:
100% for amateur sports and 50% for professional sports. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Businesses should not confuse this specific sponsorship deduction with the potentially different treatment of genuine advertising expenditure.
That classification should be determined based on the substance of the transaction.
Before sponsoring a professional Turkish sports team, a foreign business should investigate at least the following issues:
counterparty identity and signing authority; ownership of commercial rights; financial condition; existing competing sponsorships; trademark ownership; player image rights; category exclusivity; federation restrictions; international competition rules; advertising legality; taxation and VAT; data protection; sanctions screening; anti-bribery compliance; reputational exposure; termination rights; insolvency protection; dispute resolution; and enforceability.
The purpose is not merely to determine whether the contract can be signed.
The objective is to determine whether the sponsorship can remain commercially and legally viable throughout its entire duration.
Generally, yes. However, the sponsor should examine the legal identity of the contracting sports organization, commercial rights, advertising restrictions, tax treatment, federation rules, and any sector-specific regulatory requirements.
Not necessarily. Official Turkish tax guidance states that qualifying sponsorship expenditure is deductible at 100% for amateur sports and 50% for professional sports, subject to statutory requirements. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
No. Turkish Revenue Administration guidance expressly distinguishes sponsorship expenditure from advertising expenditure. The substance of the commercial arrangement is therefore important. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Only if the contract or another applicable legal basis provides an appropriate right. Foreign sponsors should negotiate relegation clauses, fee adjustments, or termination rights before signing.
Not automatically. Team sponsorship rights do not necessarily include unrestricted individual athlete image rights. The relevant licensing and image-rights arrangements should be verified separately.
Potentially, unless contractual exclusivity prevents it. Sponsors seeking category exclusivity should define both the protected commercial category and prohibited competitors carefully.
The answer depends heavily on the sponsorship agreement. A well-drafted reputation or integrity clause may provide suspension, payment adjustment, or termination rights where defined events occur.
Potentially. Contractual remedies may include specific performance, fee reduction, damages, refunds, or termination depending on the agreement and applicable law.
Yes. For substantial sponsorships, due diligence should investigate the club’s legal status, authority, financial position, commercial-rights ownership, existing sponsorships, intellectual property, regulatory position, and significant disputes.
The principal risks include incorrect tax classification, inability to deliver promised commercial rights, conflicting sponsorships, intellectual property problems, advertising restrictions, reputation damage, regulatory violations, sanctions and anti-bribery exposure, insolvency, data-protection violations, and poorly drafted termination provisions.
Sponsoring a major professional sports team can provide exceptional commercial exposure in Turkey, but a multi-season sponsorship agreement can also create substantial financial, regulatory, tax, and reputational exposure.
Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance to foreign companies, international brands, investors, sponsors, sports clubs, and commercial partners concerning sports sponsorship agreements, sponsorship due diligence, naming rights, jersey sponsorships, intellectual property licensing, athlete image rights, advertising compliance, tax risks, exclusivity clauses, reputation clauses, termination rights, regulatory compliance, and sports-related commercial disputes in Turkey.
For high-value sponsorship transactions, legal review should ideally take place before the commercial terms become binding. Proper due diligence can confirm that the club owns the rights being sold, identify regulatory restrictions, protect category exclusivity, structure termination rights, and reduce the risk of paying substantial sponsorship fees for commercial benefits that cannot ultimately be delivered.
For a case-specific assessment or legal review of a proposed professional sports sponsorship in Turkey, you may contact our office.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower No: 148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey