

Is your apartment, home or commercial property included in urban transformation in Turkey? Learn what foreign property owners should do about risky building notices, the 15-day objection period, demolition, majority decisions, contractor agreements, share sales and replacement title deeds.
Discovering that your property has been included in an urban transformation process in Turkey can be alarming, particularly if you are a foreign owner living outside the country. You may be told that the building has been declared risky, that owners are discussing demolition, that a contractor has already been selected, or that you must sign a redevelopment agreement within a short period.
The first rule is simple: do not sign documents or transfer property rights merely because someone tells you the process is urgent. First determine exactly which legal stage the property has reached.
Urban transformation is not one single procedure. A property may be undergoing a risky-building assessment, an assessment may already have become final, evacuation and demolition may have started, owners may be voting on the replacement project, or a dissenting owner’s share may be approaching the statutory sale procedure.
Each stage creates different rights, deadlines and risks.
For foreign owners, Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya recommends beginning with four questions: Has the building officially been determined to be risky? Is an objection deadline still running? Has a legally sufficient owner decision been adopted? What exactly will the owner receive if the existing property is demolished?
Do not rely exclusively on information provided by a building manager, another owner, a real estate agent or a contractor.
Ask for the official documentation.
Under the current framework, a risky-building assessment may be initiated by one property owner or the owner’s legal representative through an institution or organization licensed for this purpose. The assessment is conducted according to the applicable technical principles.
This means the process may begin without every owner first signing an agreement.
However, the fact that one owner can initiate the assessment does not mean that the same owner can unilaterally decide the contractor, replacement units or economic terms of the entire redevelopment.
This distinction is critical.
If the assessment has not yet become final, an objection right may still exist.
If it has already become final, the legal strategy may need to shift toward evacuation, demolition, owner decisions and protection of rights in the replacement project.
Ask for documents showing when the assessment was approved and how the notification process was carried out.
Do not assume that the date on which you personally learned about the matter is necessarily the date on which the legal period began.
Under the current official procedure, the risky-building assessment is notified through mechanisms including posting on the building, notification through the e-Government system and a fifteen-day announcement at the relevant neighborhood administrative office. The assessment is deemed notified on the final day of that announcement.
A property owner or legal representative may object within 15 days from the final day of that announcement. The objection is submitted to the competent Urban Transformation Directorate or, where authority has been delegated, the relevant administration.
For a foreign owner, this is one of the most dangerous deadlines to overlook.
Living abroad does not mean that the process necessarily waits until you return.
Do not automatically conclude that the objection period has not started.
The current notification system is particularly important for foreign property owners because it does not depend exclusively on traditional personal delivery of a paper notice.
If you learn that the property has been declared risky, immediately establish the official notification chronology.
Check when the relevant announcement began and ended, whether the assessment has become final, and whether any objection period remains available.
Not every owner should automatically object.
The relevant question is whether there is a genuine technical or legal basis for challenging the assessment.
An objection is not simply a statement that:
“I do not want my property demolished.”
The risky-building procedure is based on a technical assessment. If the owner believes that the report contains errors, the report should be reviewed to identify specific issues concerning the building data, structural characteristics, calculations, methodology or compliance with the applicable technical principles.
The technical committee considering the objection can review the assessment technically as a whole rather than being restricted only to the owner’s stated objection ground.
If no objection is filed within the applicable period, or an objection is rejected, the risky-building assessment becomes final.
The process can then proceed toward evacuation and demolition.
At that stage, refusing to sign a contractor agreement does not reverse the risky-building determination.
This is an essential distinction for foreign owners:
Objecting to the risky-building assessment and objecting to the proposed redevelopment agreement are two different legal matters.
You may accept that the building requires redevelopment while rejecting the financial or contractual terms offered by the contractor.
Current official guidance provides that owners and occupants may be given a period not exceeding 90 days for evacuation and demolition of a risky building.
If the building is not demolished within the prescribed period, the authorities may proceed with or arrange the evacuation and demolition under the statutory framework. Officially incurred assessment, evacuation and demolition costs may also be recovered from owners according to their shares where the relevant requirements apply.
Therefore, once the risky-building determination becomes final, the owner should not use the available time solely to arrange moving.
The same period should be used to protect ownership and contractual rights.
Before evacuation, create a complete record of the existing property.
Photograph and video the apartment, shop or office. Preserve documents showing the property’s floor, orientation, internal layout, approximate usable area, balconies, storage areas, parking rights and other significant characteristics.
For commercial property, document the frontage, entrance, display area, ceiling height, storage, customer access and any other characteristic affecting commercial value.
Also preserve title documents, architectural plans, leases, existing redevelopment documents and correspondence concerning the project.
After demolition, physical evidence concerning the original property may disappear permanently.
Before signing anything with a contractor, determine exactly what you own.
Check the registered owner, independent unit, land share, mortgages, attachments, usufruct rights, annotations and any other restrictions affecting the property.
The land share deserves particular attention.
Urban transformation decisions under the current system can depend on ownership shares. This means the legal significance of your property is not determined solely by the fact that you own “one apartment.”
The registered share structure matters.
A mortgage does not automatically prevent urban transformation.
However, demolition of the physical apartment does not mean the mortgage simply disappears.
Its effect on the underlying ownership interest, subsequent title transactions and replacement unit should be examined before the owner agrees to transfers connected with the redevelopment.
Foreign owners with financing should therefore review both the title deed and the loan-security structure before authorizing the contractor to carry out major title transactions.
An attachment or another title restriction may affect the redevelopment process and subsequent transfers.
These restrictions should be identified early.
The worst time to discover an attachment is when the contractor requires an urgent title transfer or when the new ownership structure is being registered.
Once risky-building status becomes final, owners can begin making decisions concerning the replacement project. Physical demolition does not necessarily have to occur first.
Current official guidance provides that an owners’ meeting may be initiated after the risky-building status has become final, without requiring the building to have already been demolished.
If you are a foreign owner, ask for:
the meeting notice,
the meeting minutes,
the ownership-share list,
the decision adopted,
the contractor proposal,
and the proposed redevelopment agreement.
Do not rely solely on a message saying, “Everyone has already agreed.”
No.
Where unanimity cannot be achieved, current official guidance provides that specified decisions concerning the new implementation may be adopted by owners representing at least a simple majority according to their ownership shares. The meeting and decision are also tied to the applicable share-based majority rules.
This is especially important for foreign owners because older explanations of the law may refer to different majority thresholds.
A current 2026 analysis should be used.
Not necessarily.
The relevant calculation is not simply a headcount.
If six owners hold only a minority of the relevant ownership shares, the required share-based majority may not exist.
Likewise, fewer individuals could potentially represent the required share percentage if their combined ownership shares are sufficiently large.
Therefore, whenever someone claims that the project has been approved by the majority, ask:
What percentage of the ownership shares approved it?
The implementing framework received additional procedural amendments in February 2026.
The competent authority announced that the February 4, 2026 amendment introduced documents including a new meeting notification form, a meeting-notification record, an information note for owners and a renewed sale-notification form.
For owners, this means procedural documents matter.
If your property is entering transformation in 2026, meeting notices and share-sale notifications should be assessed under the current rules rather than older templates circulating online.
Do not decide whether to participate in the redevelopment based only on a summary provided at a meeting.
Obtain the actual proposed agreement.
The agreement should answer a basic question:
Exactly what will I receive in exchange for my existing property rights?
For a residential property, important issues may include the replacement apartment, floor, orientation, net and gross area, land share, parking, storage and technical specifications.
For commercial property, frontage, entrance, visibility, ceiling height, storage and permitted use may be equally important.
This is one of the most important points for foreign owners.
Suppose you currently own a street-facing apartment on a high floor.
The contractor says:
“You will receive an equivalent apartment in the new building.”
That statement leaves several unanswered questions.
Which floor?
Which orientation?
What usable area?
What land share?
Will there be a balcony?
Will parking be included?
What will the independent-unit number be?
A replacement property should be described with sufficient precision to reduce future disputes.
The agreement should establish a clear timetable.
It should address the permit stage, commencement of construction, construction period, completion and delivery.
It should also explain what happens if the contractor is late.
Rental payments, delay compensation and contractual penalties should be clearly regulated rather than left to verbal promises.
A statement that the building will be completed “quickly” or “within a reasonable time” may provide inadequate protection.
This risk should be considered before demolition, not after construction stops.
Once the existing building has been demolished, the owner cannot simply return to the old apartment.
If the contractor loses financing, becomes insolvent or abandons construction, the owners may face an unfinished project, ongoing rental costs and complicated disputes over title rights.
The agreement should therefore address contractor security, default, termination, transferred property rights and the consequences of incomplete construction.
Do not assume that immediate transfer is automatically required merely because the property is undergoing urban transformation.
The appropriate structure depends on the project.
Where appropriate, title transfers may be structured in stages and linked to measurable construction progress or adequate security.
An owner should understand exactly what is being transferred, when it is transferred and what protection exists if the contractor fails afterward.
Foreign owners frequently manage property through a representative.
This can be practical, but the wording of the power of attorney is critical.
Authority to attend an owners’ meeting is not the same as authority to sell property.
Authority to deal with administrative applications is not necessarily the same as authority to mortgage an ownership share.
Before granting authority, determine whether the representative can:
sign the redevelopment agreement,
transfer ownership,
sell the property,
establish mortgages,
receive money,
settle disputes,
or appoint another representative.
Avoid treating a broad power of attorney as a routine document.
Do not simply ignore the process.
Current official guidance provides for the majority decision and the terms of the proposal, or information identifying where the proposal can be examined, to be communicated to owners who do not participate in the decision. The procedure includes formal notification mechanisms and a fifteen-day framework.
This notice can have serious consequences.
If you receive it, immediately examine both the validity of the majority decision and the substance of the contractor agreement.
Potentially, yes.
Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, the share of an owner who does not participate in the qualifying majority decision may become subject to the special auction procedure.
Current official guidance states that the shares of non-participating owners can be offered to the owners who have reached agreement through the applicable auction mechanism.
This does not mean the majority can simply confiscate your property.
The majority calculation, decision, notification, valuation and sale procedure must comply with the applicable framework.
But ignoring the process can be extremely risky.
Treat it as urgent.
Immediately determine whether the majority was calculated correctly, whether you were properly notified of the decision and proposed agreement, whether the statutory period was respected, how the property share was valued and whether the sale procedure complies with the current rules.
Do not wait until the ownership transfer has already occurred before investigating these issues.
Depending on the dispute, judicial remedies may be available.
However, urban transformation can generate several different types of legal disputes.
A risky-building assessment involves administrative-law issues.
A dispute over the redevelopment agreement may involve contractual remedies.
A disputed title transfer may require property-law claims.
A dissenting-owner sale can raise additional procedural and ownership questions.
The correct remedy therefore depends on the specific act that is being challenged.
Not generally.
Filing a case against an administrative act does not automatically mean that implementation stops.
Where the legal conditions are satisfied, interim judicial protection may need to be considered separately.
Timing is particularly important when demolition or another irreversible step is approaching.
An owner should therefore not assume that merely filing a lawsuit means the building is automatically protected from demolition.
You can still protect and exercise your ownership rights, but passive monitoring is dangerous.
Foreign owners should establish a system for receiving information about official notices, owners’ meetings, contractor proposals and title transactions.
Copies of important documents should be obtained directly.
Do not depend exclusively on verbal information from a contractor, property manager, neighbor or intermediary.
If a representative is appointed, the scope of authority should be clear and controlled.
Depending on the circumstances and applicable formalities, representation may be possible.
However, the representative should understand the owner’s position before attending.
The owner should decide in advance:
whether the proposed contractor is acceptable,
which contractual terms are essential,
what replacement unit is required,
which title-transfer powers are authorized,
and which matters require separate approval.
The representative should not be given unlimited discretion merely because the owner is abroad.
Commercial property requires additional attention.
Do not compare only square meters.
For a commercial unit, economic value may depend heavily on street frontage, pedestrian access, visibility, entrance location, floor level, ceiling height, storage, parking and legally permitted business use.
A contractor may offer the “same size” commercial property while substantially reducing its economic value.
These characteristics should therefore be protected in the redevelopment agreement.
If a tenant occupies the property, both the urban transformation procedure and the lease relationship should be reviewed.
The statutory evacuation of a risky building and the contractual relationship between landlord and tenant are related but legally distinct issues.
Commercial leases can be particularly complicated because the tenant may operate an active business, hold equipment or inventory, employ workers and depend on the location.
Owners should communicate developments early rather than waiting until the final evacuation stage.
Assistance mechanisms may be available to qualifying owners, tenants and certain other rights holders under the applicable transformation framework.
Eligibility and current application requirements should be checked for the specific project.
Public assistance should also be distinguished from rental payments promised contractually by the developer.
If the contractor promises monthly rental compensation during construction, the amount, payment date, duration and consequences of non-payment should be included clearly in the agreement.
Inheritance problems should be addressed early.
If the property remains registered in the name of a deceased owner, the heirs and ownership shares may need to be formally established and reflected in the title system.
This is particularly important because majority calculations depend on ownership shares.
Foreign heirs should not wait until the contractor requires signatures before addressing inheritance and registration issues.
Demolition does not mean that the owner’s economic interest simply disappears.
The redevelopment proceeds through the underlying ownership and title structure.
This is precisely why the land share, redevelopment agreement and allocation of replacement units are so important.
After demolition, the project proceeds through planning, permit, construction and title-related stages until the replacement building and independent units can be completed and properly registered.
Receiving the keys and receiving legally correct ownership are not necessarily the same event.
At completion, the owner should compare the redevelopment agreement, approved project, condominium structure, delivered unit and final title record.
The final title should be reviewed for the correct owner, correct independent unit, ownership share, mortgages, attachments, annotations and third-party rights.
Do not treat the transaction as complete until both the physical property and the legal title position have been checked.
Document the difference immediately.
Compare the property actually delivered with the redevelopment agreement and approved project.
Potential disputes can involve a smaller area, different floor, different orientation, missing parking, different commercial frontage, incomplete technical specifications or other material discrepancies.
The available remedies depend heavily on the contract and circumstances.
This is why precise drafting before demolition is significantly safer than trying to prove verbal promises years later.
A foreign owner whose property enters urban transformation should create one complete file containing the risky-building report, official notices, title records, land-share information, mortgages and attachments, architectural plans, photographs and videos of the existing property, owners’ meeting notices and minutes, contractor proposals, redevelopment agreements, powers of attorney and all documents concerning any dissenting-owner sale procedure.
Keep copies independently from the contractor or building management.
If your property has just entered urban transformation, the safest approach is to divide the matter into four immediate questions.
First: Can the risky-building determination still be challenged? Establish the official notification dates immediately. Current official guidance provides a 15-day objection period calculated from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
Second: What exactly do you own? Obtain current title records and identify the land share, mortgages, attachments and other restrictions before demolition.
Third: What has the other ownership group actually decided? Current rules allow specified redevelopment decisions to be made by a simple majority calculated according to ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved. Verify the percentages and documents rather than accepting a verbal statement that the “majority” approved the project.
Fourth: What will you receive after demolition? Before signing the contractor agreement, establish the replacement unit, floor, orientation, usable area, land share, parking, construction timetable, rental obligations, contractor security, title-transfer structure and default remedies.
The February 2026 amendments also introduced updated procedural documentation concerning owner meetings and renewed sale notifications, making it particularly important to assess current documents under the 2026 framework.
For a foreign property owner, the central strategy is straightforward:
Do not wait until demolition, construction failure or a share-sale procedure begins before examining your rights.
You may have rights to challenge particular stages or disagree with redevelopment terms, but simply refusing does not necessarily stop a lawful process. First determine whether you are disputing the risky-building assessment, the majority decision or the contractor agreement.
Yes. One owner or a legal representative can initiate the official risky-building assessment through a licensed institution under the current procedure.
The current procedure provides 15 days from the final day of the relevant local announcement for an owner or legal representative to object.
Do not assume the deadline has not started. The current notification system includes posting, electronic notification and local announcement mechanisms. The official chronology should be checked immediately.
Current official guidance provides for a period not exceeding 90 days for evacuation and demolition of a risky building.
Not necessarily. Under the current framework, specified redevelopment decisions can be adopted by a simple majority calculated according to ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved.
Potentially, yes. If the statutory requirements are satisfied, the share of a non-participating owner can become subject to the special sale procedure.
Only after understanding every authority it contains. Particular caution is appropriate where it includes powers to sell, transfer, mortgage, receive money or appoint another representative.
There is no general reason to assume an immediate unrestricted transfer is always necessary. The proposed transfer should be assessed together with construction progress, financing and security.
Verify the official risky-building status, identify all running deadlines, obtain the title records and land share, collect the owners’ meeting and contractor documents, and do not sign or transfer property rights until you understand exactly what you will receive and what happens if the redevelopment fails.
If your apartment, home, shop or office has been included in an urban transformation process, the most important period may be before the existing building is demolished.
Risky-building objections, official notifications, evacuation, ownership-share calculations, majority decisions, contractor agreements, dissenting-owner share sales, powers of attorney and title transfers can all materially affect the value and security of your property.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign homeowners, commercial property owners and real estate investors facing urban transformation and redevelopment issues in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign property owners with reviewing risky-building procedures, determining objection rights and deadlines, examining owner decisions, reviewing redevelopment agreements, protecting dissenting owners, assessing powers of attorney, monitoring title transactions and protecting rights in replacement properties.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr