

Learn how foreign maritime liens may be recognized and enforced in Turkey through ship arrest, judicial sale, foreign judgment enforcement, priority proceedings, and maritime debt recovery.
A creditor holding a maritime lien created under foreign law may seek recovery when the relevant vessel enters Turkish waters, is arrested in Turkey, or becomes subject to judicial sale proceedings before Turkish authorities.
However, a maritime lien recognized in another jurisdiction is not necessarily accepted in Turkey with the same legal character, scope, duration, or priority. Turkish courts examine the underlying claim, the applicable international rules, the vessel’s flag, and mandatory Turkish enforcement provisions.
A maritime lien is a privileged security right attached to a vessel by operation of law. Unlike a contractual ship mortgage, it may arise automatically without registration or possession.
The lien may follow the vessel despite:
A maritime lien must be distinguished from a broader maritime claim. Every maritime lien generally supports a maritime claim, but not every maritime claim creates a privileged maritime lien.
Recognition and enforcement may involve:
Turkey has ratified the 1993 International Convention on Maritime Liens and Mortgages, which entered into force internationally on 5 September 2004. The Convention seeks to harmonize the recognition, priority, and enforcement of maritime liens and registered ship mortgages.
Article 1320 of the Turkish Commercial Code grants maritime-lien status to a limited group of claims arising against the shipowner, demise charterer, manager, or operator.
These primarily include:
Wages, other employment-related payments, repatriation expenses, and certain social-security contributions payable to the master and crew may create maritime liens.
Claims arising from death or bodily injury directly connected with the operation of the vessel may enjoy lien status, subject to statutory exceptions.
Remuneration payable for salvage operations may create a maritime lien over the assisted vessel.
Certain public dues and charges relating to the vessel’s use of ports, canals, waterways, or pilotage services may qualify.
Claims arising from physical loss or damage caused by the operation of the vessel may receive maritime-lien protection, subject to the exclusions prescribed by law.
The statutory categories are limited. Ordinary bunker invoices, ship-repair debts, agency fees, charterparty claims, insurance premiums, and supply debts may constitute maritime claims without necessarily creating maritime liens.
Recognition is not automatic merely because the claim is described as a maritime lien under the law of another country.
A Turkish court may examine:
The distinction is particularly important where foreign law grants maritime-lien status to bunker suppliers, repair yards, necessaries providers, or other creditors who would not receive equivalent priority under Turkish law.
Article 1352 of the Turkish Commercial Code contains a broad and exhaustive list of claims that may support the provisional arrest of a vessel.
This list includes claims arising from matters such as:
Therefore, a foreign creditor may be entitled to arrest a vessel in Turkey even where its claim does not receive maritime-lien priority. The right to arrest and the right to privileged payment are separate questions.
A creditor claiming a foreign maritime lien may apply for provisional arrest when the vessel is within Turkish jurisdiction and the claim qualifies as a maritime claim.
The application should normally include:
The court does not usually conduct a full trial at the arrest stage. Nevertheless, the creditor must make the existence and maritime nature of the claim sufficiently credible.
Jurisdiction depends on the vessel’s flag, registry, location, and procedural status.
The competent court may generally be determined by reference to:
Because vessels may depart quickly, the creditor should identify the competent court and prepare the arrest file before the ship arrives.
The court may require counter-security to cover losses that could arise from a wrongful arrest.
The amount and form of security may depend on:
Cash deposits and bank guarantees are commonly considered. Foreign creditors should arrange security before applying, because delay may allow the vessel to sail.
Maritime liens are frequently subject to short extinguishing periods rather than ordinary limitation periods.
The applicable period may depend on:
Negotiations, demand letters, or acknowledgments may not always preserve a maritime lien. Immediate legal analysis is therefore essential.
Maritime liens may rank ahead of registered ship mortgages, even where the mortgage was created and registered before the lien arose.
Priority may be affected by:
Under Turkish law, maritime-lien claims provide a statutory security right, and the priority between different lien categories is governed by mandatory rules.
A private contractual sale does not necessarily eliminate an existing maritime lien. The lien may continue to burden the vessel in the hands of the new owner.
A properly completed judicial sale may have a different effect. Depending on the applicable procedure and notice requirements, the vessel may be transferred free from previous mortgages and maritime liens, with creditors claiming against the sale proceeds instead.
Creditors must therefore participate in the enforcement file and submit their claims within the applicable deadlines.
Once the creditor has obtained an enforceable title or completed the necessary proceedings, the vessel may be sold through compulsory enforcement.
The process may involve:
The maritime lien gives priority, but it does not guarantee full recovery where the vessel’s value is insufficient.
A foreign judgment confirming the existence of a maritime lien or underlying debt is not normally enforceable directly in Turkey.
The creditor generally needs a Turkish enforcement decision under Law No. 5718. The application may require:
The Turkish court generally does not retry the merits, but it may examine statutory grounds for refusing enforcement.
Importantly, enforcement of the monetary judgment does not always mean that every foreign-law priority classification will be accepted automatically. The treatment of the vessel and distribution of Turkish sale proceeds may remain subject to mandatory Turkish rules.
Maritime disputes are frequently resolved through arbitration in London, Paris, Singapore, New York, or other maritime centres.
A foreign arbitral award may be enforced in Turkey under the New York Convention or Turkish private international law. Refusal is limited to grounds such as:
A creditor may separately seek arrest of the vessel as security, provided the Turkish statutory requirements are satisfied.
Not always.
A foreign judgment may establish the debt, but the creditor must still demonstrate that:
Foreign judgment enforcement and vessel arrest should therefore be coordinated as separate but connected procedures.
In certain circumstances, a creditor may seek arrest of another vessel owned by the person liable for the maritime claim.
However, sister-ship arrest may not be available for every type of claim. The court will examine:
Common management, group affiliation, or similar branding is not necessarily sufficient to establish common ownership.
If the shipowner enters insolvency, restructuring, or bankruptcy proceedings, enforcement may become more complex.
The creditor should determine:
A maritime lien may provide priority, but procedural deadlines must still be observed.
Before taking action in Turkey, verify:
No. Turkish courts examine the claim, applicable law, international conventions, and mandatory Turkish rules before granting lien status or priority.
Yes. A claim may qualify as a maritime claim under Article 1352 and support ship arrest without receiving maritime-lien priority.
A bunker-supply debt may constitute a maritime claim, but it does not automatically receive maritime-lien status under Turkish law.
Yes, potentially. Crew wage claims are among the principal claims protected by maritime-lien rules, subject to evidence and applicable time limits.
Potentially, but priority depends on the nature of the claim, applicable convention, Turkish law, and competing enforcement expenses.
Potentially yes. Provisional arrest may be requested separately where the creditor proves a qualifying maritime claim and meets Turkish procedural requirements.
Usually not automatically. A maritime lien may follow the vessel into the hands of a private purchaser.
A properly completed compulsory sale may extinguish previous liens and mortgages, transferring creditor claims to the sale proceeds, subject to procedural requirements.
The period depends on the type of lien and applicable law. Many maritime liens are subject to short extinguishing periods, so rapid action is necessary.
The main risks are vessel departure, expiration of the lien, incorrect classification of the claim, hidden priority creditors, and insufficient judicial-sale proceeds.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign crew members, cargo interests, salvors, insurers, banks, shipyards, suppliers, charterers, and other maritime creditors with:
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Website: firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. Recognition and enforcement depend on the nature of the claim, vessel flag, applicable law, international conventions, supporting documents, time limits, and competing creditors.