

Sanctions Compliance and Turkish Customs Law for Foreign Investors | 2026
Learn how international sanctions affect customs transactions, imports, exports, payments, logistics, and investments in Turkey. A 2026 legal guide for foreign investors on sanctions screening, Turkish customs compliance, and risk management.
Foreign investors conducting import, export, manufacturing, logistics, banking, energy, technology, or distribution activities in Turkey must consider both Turkish customs law and applicable international sanctions.
A transaction may appear lawful from a conventional customs perspective but still create serious risk because of the parties involved, the destination country, the origin of the goods, the payment route, the end user, or the intended use of the product.
Sanctions violations may lead to blocked payments, rejected shipments, frozen assets, customs investigations, cancelled contracts, reputational damage, and exposure under anti-money laundering, terrorism-financing, proliferation-financing, export-control, or anti-smuggling rules.
A reliable compliance system must therefore assess more than whether customs duties were correctly calculated. It should examine the complete transaction, including the buyer, seller, beneficial owner, freight forwarder, vessel, bank, insurer, country, product, payment method, and ultimate end use.
International sanctions are legal restrictions imposed to address threats to international peace, terrorism, weapons proliferation, armed conflict, or other serious security concerns.
Sanctions may include:
The United Nations Security Council applies measures ranging from targeted asset freezes and travel restrictions to arms embargoes, financial controls, and commodity-related restrictions.
The United Nations Consolidated List includes individuals and entities subject to measures imposed under different Security Council sanctions regimes. Because sanctions lists change, companies must use the current version rather than relying on previously downloaded records.
Foreign investors should distinguish between:
European Union, United States, or United Kingdom sanctions do not automatically become Turkish law merely because they exist abroad.
However, they may still have major practical consequences where a transaction involves:
Accordingly, a transaction may be permissible under Turkish law but commercially impossible because a bank, insurer, carrier, supplier, or parent company is prohibited from participating.
Turkey’s sanctions-related legal framework is not contained in a single statute. Relevant rules may arise from:
Law No. 7262 regulates the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the financing of weapons proliferation. It prohibits, within the applicable resolutions, providing funds to listed persons or entities and establishing certain business relationships involving them.
Law No. 6415 governs measures relating to terrorism financing and asset freezing. It prohibits providing or collecting funds for terrorist acts and establishes mechanisms for freezing relevant assets.
Sanctions compliance and customs compliance often overlap.
Customs authorities may examine:
A company may face risk where goods are routed through an intermediary country to conceal the true destination or end user.
Similarly, changing invoices, product descriptions, consignee information, origin documents, tariff codes, or transportation records to avoid restrictions may create both sanctions and customs liability.
Before accepting a transaction, foreign investors should screen all relevant persons and entities.
Screening should cover:
A name-only comparison is not sufficient. Companies should also consider:
A company that is not expressly listed may still present risk where it is owned, controlled, represented, or used for the benefit of a sanctioned person.
The contractual buyer may not be the true beneficiary of a transaction.
Foreign investors should identify:
Complex ownership structures, recently established companies, unexplained intermediaries, or ownership changes immediately before a transaction may require enhanced investigation.
Certain goods have both civilian and military applications. These are commonly described as dual-use goods.
Risk may arise in transactions involving:
The fact that a product has a civilian description does not eliminate risk. The company must consider the product’s specifications, performance, customer, destination, and possible end use.
A technically inaccurate customs description may also be interpreted as an attempt to conceal the controlled nature of the goods.
Sanctions risk cannot be assessed by reviewing only the shipment’s immediate destination.
The company should determine:
A shipment to a non-sanctioned country may still be problematic if there are indications that the goods will be re-exported to a restricted destination.
Tariff classification determines more than customs duty rates. It may affect whether a product is subject to export controls, trade restrictions, licensing requirements, or other regulatory measures.
Sanctions-evasion risks may arise where a business:
The classification file should therefore contain technical documentation sufficient to explain why the selected tariff code is legally correct.
Country of origin and country of dispatch are different concepts.
Goods may be shipped from one country while originating in another. Repackaging, relabelling, storage, or simple transit generally does not automatically change origin.
Foreign investors should review:
Documents should reflect the actual commercial and logistical structure.
Sanctions compliance is closely connected to payment processing.
Banks may reject or delay payments because of:
Foreign investors should avoid changing payment routes merely to bypass a bank’s compliance decision.
Payments from unrelated third parties, offshore companies, cash-intensive businesses, or unexplained financial intermediaries should receive enhanced review.
Maritime and logistics transactions may create additional risk.
Companies should review:
A vessel may change its name, flag, ownership, or operator. Screening based solely on the current vessel name may therefore be insufficient.
Unusual routing, disabled tracking systems, unexplained cargo transfers, or inconsistent bills of lading may indicate diversion or sanctions-evasion risk.
Goods placed in a free zone, customs warehouse, or transit procedure remain subject to legal controls.
These procedures should not be used to:
Companies operating in free zones or warehouses should maintain detailed inventory, ownership, movement, and customer records.
A company cannot safely transfer its entire sanctions responsibility to a customs broker or freight forwarder.
Service providers may submit declarations and arrange transportation, but the investor should maintain independent controls over:
Broker agreements should require immediate reporting of suspicious instructions, customs inquiries, document inconsistencies, and route changes.
Common sanctions and customs red flags include:
One red flag may have an innocent explanation. Several connected red flags require enhanced due diligence and possible transaction suspension.
A foreign investor operating in Turkey should establish a written compliance program covering:
The program should reflect the company’s industry, products, customer base, countries, transaction volume, and ownership structure.
For higher-risk transactions, companies should obtain written end-user documentation.
An end-user statement may address:
A signed statement does not replace independent verification. The information should be checked against public records, transaction documents, and commercial reality.
A sanctions compliance file may include:
Turkish rules implementing asset-freezing measures may require relevant records to be retained and made available to competent authorities.
Records should show not only that screening occurred, but also when it occurred, which lists were checked, who approved the transaction, and how identified risks were resolved.
International contracts should contain sanctions and trade-compliance clauses addressing:
Contractual clauses reduce risk but do not protect a company that ignores obvious warning signs.
A potential sanctions match should not be treated as a confirmed violation without verification.
The company should:
Employees should never delete, alter, or recreate documents after a concern has been identified.
Depending on the facts, sanctions-related customs violations may lead to:
The consequences may arise under Turkish law, foreign law, contractual obligations, or several regimes simultaneously.
Before investing in or acquiring a Turkish company, foreign investors should examine whether the target:
Historical violations may remain within the acquired company after closing, particularly in share acquisitions.
In 2026, foreign investors should assume that sanctions screening is a continuous obligation rather than a one-time onboarding exercise.
The United Nations Consolidated List is updated when individuals or entities are added, amended, or removed. Businesses should therefore rescreen active customers, suppliers, beneficial owners, and other relevant parties at appropriate intervals.
Companies should also monitor changes in Turkish law, presidential decisions, United Nations measures, foreign sanctions regimes relevant to their corporate group, and the compliance requirements of banks, insurers, carriers, and commercial partners.
The strongest compliance systems combine legal review with accurate customs data, beneficial ownership analysis, product knowledge, transaction monitoring, and documented management oversight.
Turkey has legislation governing the implementation of relevant United Nations Security Council measures, including rules concerning terrorism financing, proliferation financing, prohibited transactions, and asset freezing.
Not automatically as Turkish domestic law. However, they may affect a Turkish transaction through European parent companies, banks, insurers, carriers, contractual obligations, or financing arrangements.
Yes. A foreign bank may apply the sanctions rules of its own jurisdiction or internal risk policies even where Turkish law does not expressly prohibit the transaction.
Companies should apply risk-based screening to relevant parties, including customers, suppliers, intermediaries, beneficial owners, banks, carriers, and end users.
Customs brokers may have their own obligations, but using a broker does not eliminate the importer’s or exporter’s responsibility to maintain effective compliance controls.
Dual-use goods are products, software, or technology capable of both civilian and military or security-related use.
No. Lists and ownership structures may change. Active relationships should be rescreened periodically and when material transaction details change.
The transaction should be paused, identifying information should be verified, records should be preserved, and legal advice should be obtained before goods or funds are transferred.
Yes. Misclassification may conceal a controlled product or prevent the application of a required licence, restriction, or compliance review.
Yes. Sanctions and customs compliance should form part of legal due diligence, especially where the target conducts international trade or operates in sensitive industries.
Sanctions compliance requires more than checking a customer’s name against a list. Companies must evaluate ownership, control, goods, payment routes, logistics, destination, end use, customs documentation, and foreign-law exposure.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises foreign investors, multinational companies, importers, exporters, manufacturers, logistics providers, distributors, and financial stakeholders on Turkish customs law, sanctions compliance, restricted-party screening, customs investigations, export controls, transaction due diligence, and compliance-program development.
Early legal review can prevent blocked shipments, rejected payments, administrative penalties, contractual disputes, and serious reputational damage.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
Contact Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office for strategic, confidential, and business-focused legal support concerning sanctions compliance and customs transactions in Turkey.
Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Sanctions obligations depend on the parties, products, destination, payment route, applicable jurisdiction, ownership structure, end use, and specific facts of each transaction.