

Can a foreign landlord demand restoration after unauthorized renovations in Turkey? Learn about written consent, repair costs, eviction and compensation remedies.
A foreign landlord may discover that a tenant has removed walls, changed flooring, installed fixtures, altered plumbing, replaced windows or made other renovations without permission.
The key question is whether the tenant had written consent and whether the alteration can remain without damaging the property or violating building rules. In many cases, a landlord may demand restoration, repair costs or compensation. However, restoration is not automatic in every dispute.
The result depends on the lease, the nature of the renovation, the condition of the property before the tenancy, any consent given by the landlord and the evidence available.
A renovation may be unauthorized when the tenant changes the property without the landlord’s required consent or exceeds the scope of permission that was granted.
Examples may include:
Minor decoration may be treated differently from structural work. Painting a wall, hanging shelves or replacing removable furniture may not have the same legal consequences as removing a wall, changing plumbing or altering the building’s exterior.
The lease and the technical nature of the work should be reviewed before the landlord demands restoration.
Potentially, yes.
A landlord may demand that the tenant return the apartment to its previous condition when the tenant made unauthorized changes, caused damage or exceeded the landlord’s written consent.
The landlord may seek:
However, the tenant may argue that the landlord approved the work, accepted the renovation, knew about it and remained silent or benefited from the improvement.
The landlord should therefore avoid making assumptions and should preserve evidence of the original condition and the unauthorized work.
Written consent is one of the most important issues in a renovation dispute.
The landlord should determine whether consent was given through:
Consent may be limited. For example, a landlord may have approved painting but not the removal of a wall. Permission to install furniture may not authorize changes to plumbing or electrical systems.
If the landlord expressly approved the work, a restoration demand may be limited by the wording of that approval. The agreement may state whether the tenant must remove the improvement at the end of the lease or whether it will remain.
If the tenant is still occupying the apartment, the landlord should not enter by force or begin demolition personally.
The landlord may send a written notice requesting:
If the renovation creates a safety risk or serious structural concern, an urgent technical inspection and interim court protection may be appropriate.
A serious and continuing breach may also support termination or eviction proceedings. Whether termination is available depends on the lease, the severity of the alteration, the possibility of correction and the applicable procedure.
Restoration claims commonly arise after the tenant returns the keys or is removed from the property.
The landlord should inspect the apartment immediately and preserve:
The landlord should not carry out major repairs before documenting the condition unless immediate work is necessary to prevent further damage.
If urgent repairs are required, the landlord should photograph the damage, preserve removed materials where practical and keep all invoices.
Structural changes require special attention.
Removing a wall, changing load-bearing elements, altering plumbing, modifying electrical systems or affecting the exterior may create risks for neighboring apartments and the building as a whole.
The landlord may need to consider:
The landlord should not personally demolish a potentially unsafe structure. Work should be performed by qualified professionals after the legal and technical position is assessed.
The strongest restoration claim compares the apartment’s condition before and after the tenancy.
Useful evidence may include:
If no formal handover report exists, the landlord may still rely on witnesses, photographs, videos, contractor records, property advertisements and other evidence.
The absence of an initial report does not automatically defeat the landlord’s claim, but it may make the dispute more difficult.
The landlord may claim reasonable restoration and repair costs caused by the unauthorized renovation.
The claim may include:
The landlord should distinguish restoration from improvement. The tenant should generally not be charged for an unnecessary upgrade that leaves the property in a better condition than before.
Repair estimates should be detailed and supported by invoices where the work has already been completed. The landlord should avoid inflated estimates and duplicate claims.
The security deposit may be relevant to restoration costs and other proven tenant obligations.
The landlord should prepare a written accounting identifying:
The landlord should not automatically retain the entire deposit. Deductions should be connected to documented losses and should comply with the lease and applicable rules.
If restoration costs exceed the deposit, the landlord may pursue the remaining amount through negotiation, mediation, court proceedings or enforcement.
A serious unauthorized renovation may constitute a lease breach and may support termination or eviction.
The landlord should assess:
Termination is not always automatic. The landlord may need to send a notice, allow correction where required, attend mediation and file the appropriate court claim.
The landlord should not change the locks, remove the tenant’s belongings or demolish the renovation without following the lawful procedure.
Many lease-related disputes involve a pre-litigation mediation stage before a court claim can proceed. The exact requirement depends on the claim and the type of tenancy.
Mediation may resolve:
If mediation fails, the landlord may file a civil claim. The court may appoint or consider technical experts to assess the original condition, the nature of the renovation and the reasonable cost of restoration.
An interim injunction may be considered if the tenant is continuing unauthorized work or the property faces immediate harm.
Urgent protection may be relevant where:
An interim measure is temporary and does not finally decide the restoration claim. The applicant generally needs to show a credible legal claim, urgency and a serious risk of harm. Security may be required.
A foreign landlord may often pursue a restoration and compensation claim without traveling to Turkey.
A lawyer acting under a properly prepared power of attorney may be able to:
The power of attorney may require authentication, legalization or an apostille, together with a reliable translation.
The landlord should provide the lawyer with all photographs, lease documents, inspection reports, contractor records and communications concerning the renovation.
If the court rejects the restoration or compensation claim, the landlord may have appeal or review options depending on the type of decision and procedural stage.
An appeal may concern:
If an interim protection application is rejected, the written decision should be reviewed immediately because procedural periods may begin from formal service.
After a final judgment, court-supervised enforcement may be required to collect restoration costs or obtain compliance.
A foreign landlord should:
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya recommends separating three issues clearly: whether the renovation was authorized, what restoration is technically required and what financial loss was actually caused.
1. Can a foreign landlord demand restoration after an unauthorized renovation?
Potentially, yes. The landlord may demand restoration when the tenant made unauthorized changes or caused damage beyond ordinary use.
2. Is written consent required for every renovation?
Not necessarily. Minor decoration may be treated differently from structural or permanent alterations. The lease and the scope of the work should be reviewed.
3. What if the landlord verbally approved the renovation?
The tenant may rely on the alleged approval. Emails, messages, witnesses and the exact scope of the permission may determine whether restoration can be demanded.
4. Can the landlord remove an unauthorized wall immediately?
The landlord should not personally demolish the work. A technical assessment and lawful restoration process may be necessary, especially where safety is involved.
5. Can restoration costs be deducted from the security deposit?
Potentially, if the costs are proven, reasonable and connected to the tenant’s obligations. The landlord should prepare a detailed accounting.
6. Can the landlord terminate the lease because of unauthorized renovations?
A serious or continuing breach may support termination or eviction, but the appropriate notice and procedural requirements must be followed.
7. What evidence is needed to prove the original condition of the apartment?
Move-in photographs, inventories, handover reports, prior invoices, witnesses, expert assessments and building records may be useful.
8. Can the landlord claim lost rent during restoration?
Possibly. The landlord should prove that the damage made the apartment unavailable, that restoration was reasonably necessary and that the claimed loss is supported.
9. Is mediation required before a restoration or eviction lawsuit?
Many lease disputes involve a pre-litigation mediation stage. The exact requirement depends on the type of claim and tenancy.
10. Can a foreign landlord handle the case from abroad?
Often, yes. A lawyer may act under a properly authenticated power of attorney and manage inspection, mediation, litigation and enforcement.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We recommend consulting a lawyer about your specific circumstances to avoid any loss of rights.
Expert legal support is essential when a tenant makes unauthorized renovations in a foreign-owned apartment.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides professional assistance in restoration claims, repair-cost recovery, lease termination, eviction proceedings, compensation disputes, technical evidence, mediation, interim injunctions and court-supervised enforcement.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yildirim Tower No:148, Balgat, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey