

A step-by-step 2026 guide to urban transformation in Turkey for foreign homeowners, covering risky building assessment, the 15-day objection period, demolition, owner meetings, majority decisions, contractor agreements, dissenting-owner share sales, construction and the new title deed.
A foreign homeowner may discover that an apartment in Turkey has entered urban transformation without fully understanding what happens next. The building manager may say that the property has been declared risky, other owners may begin discussing contractors, or the owner may receive information that demolition is approaching.
The process can appear confusing because urban transformation is not a single transaction. It is a sequence of technical, administrative, ownership and contractual stages.
Under Law No. 6306, the process may begin with an official risky-building assessment and continue through notification, objection, evacuation, demolition, owner decision-making, contractor selection, redevelopment agreements, construction and registration of the replacement property.
Foreign homeowners face an additional practical difficulty: the process can continue while they are outside Turkey. Official notices, owner meetings and important deadlines should therefore not be ignored merely because the owner is abroad.
The following step-by-step guide explains how the process generally works and identifies the points at which a foreign homeowner should protect their rights.
The first question should always be whether there is an official urban transformation procedure or merely a proposal being discussed by the owners.
A contractor may approach the building and offer redevelopment even before an official risky-building assessment exists.
Likewise, other owners may discuss replacing an old building without the building yet having acquired official risky-building status.
Foreign homeowners should therefore ask for the relevant official documents rather than relying exclusively on verbal information.
Where the process is based on a risky building under Law No. 6306, the existence and status of the official risky-building assessment should be verified first.
Under the current official procedure, the risky-building assessment may be initiated by one owner or that owner’s legal representative through an institution or organization licensed for this purpose.
Unanimous approval of all owners is not required merely to initiate the assessment.
This is particularly important for foreign homeowners.
Imagine that a foreign owner has an apartment in a building with fifteen other owners but spends most of the year outside Turkey. Another owner may initiate the risky-building assessment without first obtaining the foreign owner’s signature.
The foreign owner may therefore become aware of the process only after the assessment has already begun.
The assessment is not based merely on the age or appearance of the building.
Risky buildings are assessed according to the technical principles established under the implementing framework of Law No. 6306.
An old building is therefore not automatically an officially risky building.
Likewise, visible cracks or earthquake concerns do not, by themselves, replace the formal assessment procedure.
For a foreign owner, the distinction between a private engineering opinion and an official risky-building assessment is important.
After the licensed institution prepares the risky-building report, it is submitted to the competent Urban Transformation Directorate or, where authority has been delegated, the relevant administration.
The competent authority reviews the report.
If deficiencies or errors are identified, the report can be returned to the institution that prepared it for correction. If it is found appropriate, the relevant title deed authority is notified concerning the risky-building status.
At this stage, foreign homeowners should obtain the actual report rather than relying on another owner’s summary of it.
Notification is one of the most important stages for foreign homeowners.
Under the current procedure, information concerning the risky-building assessment is posted on the building, communicated through the e-Government system and announced at the relevant local administrative office for fifteen days. Risky-building notices are also published through the competent authority’s notification system.
The assessment is deemed notified on the final day of the relevant local announcement.
This means a foreign owner should not assume:
“I am abroad and nobody personally delivered a document to me, so no legal deadline can be running.”
That assumption can be dangerous.
Once the notification chronology has been established, the next question is whether the risky-building assessment can still be challenged.
The current official procedure allows building owners or their legal representatives to object within 15 days from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
The objection is submitted to the competent Urban Transformation Directorate or the authorized administration.
For a foreign homeowner, this may be one of the most important deadlines in the entire process.
If the owner learns about the assessment late, immediate legal and technical review may be necessary.
An objection should not simply say:
“I do not want my apartment demolished.”
The risky-building assessment is fundamentally a technical determination.
The report should therefore be examined to determine whether there are technical or procedural grounds capable of affecting its validity.
The technical committee responsible for objections consists of seven members under the current official framework.
A foreign homeowner should distinguish between opposition to the risky-building assessment and opposition to the contractor’s future redevelopment proposal.
These are different disputes.
If no timely objection is filed, or if the objection process results in confirmation of the assessment, risky-building status becomes final and the process moves toward evacuation and demolition.
At this point, the owner’s strategy changes.
The questions are no longer limited to whether the building is risky.
The owner must also begin protecting the economic and legal position in the future project.
This is the stage at which title deed records, land shares, mortgages, attachments and the characteristics of the existing apartment become particularly important.
Before demolition, obtain the current title records.
Foreign homeowners should check the registered owner, independent unit, land share, mortgages, attachments, usufruct rights, annotations and other restrictions.
The land share is particularly important because redevelopment decisions under the current framework are connected to ownership shares.
A person may own one apartment but hold a substantially different land share from another apartment owner.
Therefore, counting apartments or owners is not enough when determining voting power.
Before leaving the property, create a detailed record of the existing apartment.
Take photographs and videos.
Preserve architectural documents where available.
Record the floor, orientation, layout, approximate usable area, balconies, storage areas, parking rights and other important characteristics.
Why?
Because after demolition the original apartment physically disappears.
If a later dispute arises concerning whether the replacement apartment is genuinely equivalent to what was promised, evidence concerning the original property may become important.
After the risky-building determination becomes final, the statutory evacuation and demolition process proceeds.
Under the current official framework, owners and occupants may be given a period not exceeding 90 days for evacuation and demolition.
If the risky building is not demolished within the applicable period, the authorities can proceed with the statutory evacuation and demolition mechanisms.
Official guidance also states that where the administration carries out the evacuation or demolition because the owners failed to do so, the relevant costs can be recovered from the owners according to their shares.
A foreign owner cannot necessarily prevent a final statutory demolition procedure simply by refusing to sign.
Official guidance provides that a demolition permit for a risky building can be issued upon the application of one or more owners or their representatives once the applicable conditions are satisfied, without requiring the consent of every owner.
If the owner believes that the administrative process is unlawful, the relevant legal remedies should be considered promptly.
Passive refusal and a formal legal challenge are not the same thing.
The next major stage concerns the new project.
Importantly, owners do not necessarily have to wait until the physical building has been demolished.
Current official guidance states that after risky-building status becomes final, a meeting concerning the new implementation may be held at the request of an owner without requiring the building to have already been demolished.
Foreign homeowners should therefore become involved early.
Waiting for demolition before asking about the new project may mean that negotiations are already far advanced.
The owners discuss what will happen to the property.
Depending on the project, issues can include contractor selection, reconstruction, the distribution of replacement units and the contractual structure.
Current official guidance states that the meeting is held with owners representing at least a simple majority according to their ownership shares. The decision is likewise adopted with the required share-based simple majority and recorded in the meeting documentation.
For foreign homeowners, participation can therefore be economically significant.
One of the most important rules in the current system is the share-based simple-majority mechanism.
Where unanimity cannot be achieved, specified decisions concerning the new implementation may be made by owners representing a simple majority according to their ownership shares.
This means a foreign owner should not rely on older general statements that every redevelopment decision necessarily requires unanimity or an older voting threshold.
It also means that the number of people voting is not enough.
The ownership shares must be calculated.
Suppose a building contains twelve owners.
Seven say they have approved the contractor.
Does that automatically establish the required majority?
No.
Their combined ownership shares must be examined.
A foreign homeowner who is told that “the majority has already decided” should request the ownership-share calculation, meeting minutes and decision.
This is especially important if the owner disagrees with the project.
Do not choose a contractor solely because the contractor promises the largest apartment.
Owners should consider financial capacity, completed projects, ongoing developments, financing structure, technical capacity and the security offered for completion.
Urban transformation creates a particular risk because the existing building is demolished before the replacement property is completed.
If the contractor subsequently encounters severe financial problems, the owner may have no existing home to return to.
Contractor due diligence is therefore part of property protection.
The redevelopment agreement is one of the most important documents in the entire process.
The contract should clearly identify what the foreign homeowner will receive.
Important provisions may include the replacement apartment, floor, orientation, net and gross area, land share, parking, storage, technical specifications, construction commencement, permit obligations, completion deadline, temporary rent, delay compensation, contractual penalties, security, title transfers, termination and contractor default.
Do not rely on promises such as:
“You will receive the same apartment.”
The contract should define what “same” actually means.
The future apartment should be described as precisely as reasonably possible.
For example, if the existing property has a valuable orientation, parking space or storage area, the owner should determine whether those characteristics will exist in the replacement property.
A larger nominal floor area does not necessarily mean a more valuable apartment.
Floor, orientation, internal usable area and project characteristics can materially affect value.
Foreign homeowners should therefore evaluate the replacement property economically as well as legally.
Urban transformation can take years if construction encounters problems.
The redevelopment agreement should therefore define the construction timetable.
It should also regulate temporary rental payments where the contractor has agreed to provide them.
The amount, commencement date, duration and consequences of non-payment should be clear.
Likewise, the contract should explain what happens if construction is delivered six months, one year or two years late.
Some redevelopment models involve transferring land shares or rights to the contractor.
This is a high-risk stage.
Foreign homeowners should understand exactly which rights will be transferred, at what time and in exchange for what construction progress.
Where legally and commercially appropriate, staged transfers tied to measurable construction milestones may offer stronger protection than transferring substantial rights at the beginning.
The contract should also address what happens to transferred rights if the contractor defaults.
Foreign homeowners frequently manage the process through a representative because they live abroad.
A power of attorney can be useful, but it should not be treated as a routine formality.
Authority to attend an owners’ meeting is different from authority to transfer title.
Authority to submit permit documents is different from authority to sell the property.
Before signing, determine whether the representative can sell, transfer, mortgage, receive money, sign the redevelopment agreement, settle disputes or appoint another representative.
Only the powers genuinely intended by the owner should be granted.
Do not simply ignore the project.
Current official guidance requires the majority decision and the terms of the offer, or information identifying where the offer can be examined, to be communicated to owners who do not participate in the agreement.
The notification may be made through the prescribed notarial procedure or through a fifteen-day announcement at the relevant local administrative office.
A foreign owner who receives such a notice should immediately examine the decision and proposed agreement.
If a qualifying majority decision exists and an owner does not participate in the agreement, the statutory share-sale procedure may become relevant.
Current official guidance provides that the shares of non-participating owners can be offered through an auction process. The initial sale is restricted to owners who have reached agreement.
If the first sale is unsuccessful and the relevant requirements are satisfied, subsequent sale procedures may eventually allow third-party participation. A third party must accept the majority decision and applicable contractual framework and satisfy additional requirements before participating.
Therefore, a foreign owner should never treat a share-sale notice as an informal threat that can simply be ignored.
The possibility of a statutory share sale does not mean the majority can simply confiscate the dissenting owner’s property.
The legal procedure matters.
Questions may include whether the required majority existed, whether the meeting was valid, whether the owner received proper notification, whether the offer corresponded to the majority decision, whether the valuation was properly conducted and whether the auction procedure complied with the applicable framework.
These issues should be reviewed before the sale is completed whenever possible.
Foreign homeowners should ensure that documents used in 2026 reflect the current procedure.
The Urban Transformation Directorate announced that an amendment published on February 4, 2026 added new procedural documents, including a meeting notification form, a meeting-notification record, an information note to be served on owners and a renewed sale-notification form.
This makes outdated online templates particularly risky.
Meeting and sale documentation should be evaluated under the current framework.
Once the ownership and contractual structure has progressed sufficiently, the project moves into the construction and permit stages.
Foreign homeowners should continue monitoring the project even after signing the agreement.
Important questions include whether permits have been obtained, whether construction has actually commenced, whether progress corresponds to the contractual timetable and whether the contractor is complying with technical obligations.
Signing the agreement is not the end of the owner’s involvement.
Owners should keep records throughout construction.
If the agreement provides for staged title transfers, the owner should verify that the relevant construction milestone has genuinely been achieved before approving the next transfer.
Material project changes should also be reviewed.
A contractor should not be permitted to change economically important characteristics of the replacement apartment without considering the owner’s contractual rights.
This is one of the most serious urban transformation disputes.
If construction stops, the legal position depends heavily on the redevelopment agreement and the transactions already completed.
Possible issues can include termination, recovery of transferred rights, enforcement of security, delay compensation, damages and appointment of another contractor.
The earlier the owner’s title rights were transferred, the more complicated the dispute can become.
This is why contractor-default provisions should be negotiated before the old building is demolished.
Demolition of the physical apartment does not mean existing title restrictions can simply be ignored.
Mortgages, attachments, usufruct rights and other restrictions should be analyzed in relation to the underlying ownership share and replacement title structure.
A foreign homeowner with mortgage financing should address these matters before signing documents requiring title transfers.
Inheritance can delay redevelopment if the ownership position is not regularized.
Where a registered owner dies, the heirs and their respective shares may need to be formally determined and reflected in the title system.
Because voting and redevelopment rights depend on ownership shares, unresolved inheritance issues can affect meetings, agreements and title transactions.
Foreign heirs should address these issues as early as possible.
Physical completion is an important milestone, but it is not the only one.
The official framework recognizes that completion also involves matters such as establishment of condominium easement or condominium ownership and obtaining the occupancy permit after the necessary ownership procedures have been completed.
Foreign homeowners should therefore avoid treating delivery of the keys as the sole test of completion.
Before final acceptance, compare the apartment actually delivered with the redevelopment agreement and approved project.
Check the floor, orientation, usable area, layout, technical specifications, parking and storage.
Record defects or discrepancies.
If the delivered apartment materially differs from the agreed property, preserving evidence promptly can be important for subsequent claims.
The final title registration deserves the same attention as the physical apartment.
Check whether the correct person is registered as owner and whether the correct independent unit has been allocated.
Also verify the ownership share and whether unexpected mortgages, attachments, annotations or third-party rights appear on the title.
A foreign homeowner should not assume that receiving the keys automatically proves that the title deed is correct.
At the end of the project, three elements should correspond:
the redevelopment agreement,
the property actually delivered,
and
the final title registration.
If the contract promises one apartment, the physical building contains another and the title deed records something different, the project is not legally satisfactory merely because construction has ended.
This final comparison is an essential part of completing the transformation process.
In practical terms, the process can be summarized as:
Risky-building assessment → Official review → Notification → 15-day objection period → Technical review if an objection is filed → Final risky-building status → Evacuation and demolition → Ownership and land-share verification → Owners’ meeting → Share-based majority decision → Contractor selection → Redevelopment agreement → Notification to non-participating owners → Share-sale procedure where applicable → Permit and construction procedures → Construction monitoring → Completion → Condominium and occupancy procedures → Final title deed → Delivery of the replacement property.
The precise sequence can vary depending on the project, ownership structure, litigation, zoning issues and contractual arrangements.
A foreign homeowner should divide the entire process into five protection stages.
Stage One: Protect the deadline. As soon as you learn that the building has been declared risky, establish the official notification dates. The current objection period is 15 days from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
Stage Two: Protect the existing property. Obtain the title records, verify the land share and restrictions, and document the physical apartment before demolition.
Stage Three: Protect your voting and contractual position. Current official guidance permits specified new-project decisions through a simple majority calculated according to ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved. Verify the actual shares, meeting documents and contractor agreement rather than relying on verbal information.
Stage Four: Protect against contractor failure. Examine security, construction milestones, title transfers, rental payments, delay provisions and termination rights before surrendering valuable property rights.
Stage Five: Protect the replacement property. At completion, compare the redevelopment agreement, approved project, apartment actually delivered and final title deed.
The most important rule for foreign homeowners is simple:
Do not wait until demolition to become involved. By that stage, some of the most important decisions concerning your future property may already have been made.
Yes. Your physical absence does not automatically prevent a risky-building assessment, official notifications or later transformation procedures from progressing.
No. Current official guidance provides that one owner or the owner’s legal representative may initiate the risky-building assessment through a licensed institution.
The current procedure provides 15 days from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
Current official guidance provides for a period not exceeding 90 days.
No. Where unanimity cannot be achieved, specified redevelopment decisions may be made by a simple majority calculated according to ownership shares.
Yes. Active monitoring and properly structured representation can allow a foreign homeowner to protect their position without being physically present at every stage.
Potentially, yes. Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, the share of a non-participating owner may enter the special auction procedure.
Do not assume that an immediate unrestricted transfer is always necessary. The transfer structure should be reviewed together with construction milestones, financing and security.
Possible remedies depend on the redevelopment agreement and transactions already completed. They may involve termination, security enforcement, damages, title-related claims and arrangements for completing the project.
The process should not be considered complete merely when the keys are delivered. The owner should verify the completed property, occupancy and condominium procedures, and the final title registration.
For a foreign homeowner, urban transformation can involve much more than demolition and reconstruction. It may affect official objection deadlines, land shares, voting rights, contractor agreements, temporary rental arrangements, title transfers, dissenting-owner share sales and ownership of the replacement apartment.
Foreign homeowners living outside the country face an additional risk because the statutory process may continue while they are abroad.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign homeowners and property investors throughout urban transformation projects.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign clients with risky-building procedures, objection rights, owner meetings, majority decisions, redevelopment agreements, dissenting-owner procedures, powers of attorney, contractor disputes, construction delays and protection of replacement-property and title deed rights.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr